![]() |
|
|||||||
| Relationships People who need people; or, why can't we all just get along? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#8 | ||
|
~~Life is either a daring adventure or nothing.~~
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,828
|
This happened at my sister's house. I suggested homeowners. Quote:
This is my opinion, which has landed me into my first family feud ever. Quote:
Dog sitting. I came to this conclusion too, however the details are murky about how exactly a 10 year old barnacled poodle launched the attack. It’s not very high. $260. This is more about who is right and who is wrong, legally and according to me, ethically. It is very wrong to be treating an elderly woman the way they are, and her little poodle. You know how old ladies are about their poodles. The vet said it was very close to the jugler. The poodle got huge staples to close it shut. The owner of the dog paid half and my sister paid half. My sister wants her half back from my mother and lays the blame on the little dog. She has some infinite monkey going on, I think. I take the stance that, if I had a large dog, I would pay because it's the right thing to do. I never imagined that THAT little comment would draw a battle line. Bottom line. My mother isn't paying for the vet bill. I told my sis it was the big dogs owners responsibility and if she didn't want to make him pay, she could look into homeowners insurance. She insists that my mother's dog is the instigator and should pay. There is an inconsistency about what happened after my mother's poodle 'viciously' attacked the husky. My sister either pulled the little dog off ( not sure how you would pull a little dog out of the mouth of a large dog) or the big dog flung the poodle away after biting down on her neck, which implies no action was taken. That makes her negligent and responsible too. |
||
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|