Consider

kerosene · 10-20-2011, 03:58 PM

From the perspective of a no-patience-for-dogs-or-irresponsible-owners/sitters type, I think the sitter should foot the whole thing and take complete responsibility. Who pairs up a huskie and a barnacle style poodle and expects that to end well? They are animals, for pete's sake. It's not like the neighbor could control what the dog was doing while she/he was away. Isn't that part of the reason for hiring someone to watch the dog in the first place?

Pete Zicato · 10-20-2011, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kerosene

They are animals, for pete's sake.

Well I didn't actually ask them to be animals, but I may have hinted.

And I agree with you about the responsibility. If you agree to pet sit. You take the responsibility of making sure the animals are comfortable.

kerosene · 10-26-2011, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete Zicato

Well I didn't actually ask them to be animals, but I may have hinted.

And I agree with you about the responsibility. If you agree to pet sit. You take the responsibility of making sure the animals are comfortable.

So, then you must be responsible for the bill

Pete Zicato · 10-26-2011, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kerosene

So, then you must be responsible for the bill

Wait! These were ducks?

10-20-2011, 03:58 PM	#1
kerosene Touring the facilities Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The plains of Colorado Posts: 3,476	From the perspective of a no-patience-for-dogs-or-irresponsible-owners/sitters type, I think the sitter should foot the whole thing and take complete responsibility. Who pairs up a huskie and a barnacle style poodle and expects that to end well? They are animals, for pete's sake. It's not like the neighbor could control what the dog was doing while she/he was away. Isn't that part of the reason for hiring someone to watch the dog in the first place?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)