Poor, Pitiful Palin

[TheMercenary]

As I stated, it was to point out the duplicity. I am glad you now see it.

[Happy Monkey]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

As I stated, it was to point out the duplicity. I am glad you now see it.

The post you were responding to was about McCain, and said nothing about his parenting skills or whether he should have been a politician. So no, you were pointing out no duplicity or hypocracy.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

The post you were responding to was about McCain, and said nothing about his parenting skills or whether he should have been a politician. So no, you were pointing out no duplicity or hypocracy.

Bull shit. You have no authority or crystal ball to define my intentions in a post. So no, you are full of shit. When you get the ability to get into any individual posters head and tell us all what their intentions are let me know. There is a whole Congress of scumbags I want you to examine.

[Happy Monkey]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Bull shit. You have no authority or crystal ball to define my intentions in a post.

I don't need authority or a crystal ball to read your post, the post it was replying to, or the thread they were in. There was nothing about McCains parenting skills, or his decision to become a senator despite having a family. So no, you were pointing out no duplicity or hypocracy.

I'd need a crystal ball to discover whether you actually believed that you were, but if you did then you were incorrect.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

I don't need authority or a crystal ball to read your post, the post it was replying to, or the thread they were in. There was nothing about McCains parenting skills, or his decision to become a senator despite having a family. So no, you were pointing out no duplicity or hypocracy.

I'd need a crystal ball to discover whether you actually believed that you were, but if you did then you were incorrect.

What was the date of the discussion? But you made the Assumption. So you were wrong. It was totally about hypocracy and duplicity.

[Happy Monkey]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

What was the date of the discussion? But you made the Assumption. So you were wrong. It was totally about hypocracy and duplicity.

Shawnee linked to it, mr "google my sources yourself". I made no assumptions; I read the post. Your post pointed out no duplicity or hypocracy.

[Sheldonrs]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7zvGGSkLe0


An interesting twist.