Poor, Pitiful Palin

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

The post you were responding to was about McCain, and said nothing about his parenting skills or whether he should have been a politician. So no, you were pointing out no duplicity or hypocracy.

Bull shit. You have no authority or crystal ball to define my intentions in a post. So no, you are full of shit. When you get the ability to get into any individual posters head and tell us all what their intentions are let me know. There is a whole Congress of scumbags I want you to examine.

[Happy Monkey]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Bull shit. You have no authority or crystal ball to define my intentions in a post.

I don't need authority or a crystal ball to read your post, the post it was replying to, or the thread they were in. There was nothing about McCains parenting skills, or his decision to become a senator despite having a family. So no, you were pointing out no duplicity or hypocracy.

I'd need a crystal ball to discover whether you actually believed that you were, but if you did then you were incorrect.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

I don't need authority or a crystal ball to read your post, the post it was replying to, or the thread they were in. There was nothing about McCains parenting skills, or his decision to become a senator despite having a family. So no, you were pointing out no duplicity or hypocracy.

I'd need a crystal ball to discover whether you actually believed that you were, but if you did then you were incorrect.

What was the date of the discussion? But you made the Assumption. So you were wrong. It was totally about hypocracy and duplicity.

[Happy Monkey]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

What was the date of the discussion? But you made the Assumption. So you were wrong. It was totally about hypocracy and duplicity.

Shawnee linked to it, mr "google my sources yourself". I made no assumptions; I read the post. Your post pointed out no duplicity or hypocracy.

[Sheldonrs]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7zvGGSkLe0


An interesting twist.

[tw]

Originally Posted by classicman

Didn't you call a posters wife a "gonorrhea dripping whore"?

As a wacko extremist, you routinely forget relevant facts. Once we discussed your wife's gonorrhea, you suddenly stopped doing incendiary attacks. I do not apologize for slapping you back to civility using the only tone you understand. Posts as equally nasty finally made you civil - for a while. Wackos forget lessons from history. Why should it be necessary for for him to learn again?

Redux has accurately described your political agenda:

To ignore the Clinton "finding" to kill Bin Laden, the Clarke memo, and the disbanding of Alec Station and the diversion of resources from Afghanistan to Iraq.....is the revisionist history and is nothing short of irresponsible and inaccurate.

morethanpretty also described Classicman's political agenda in Choosing network adapter in the Technology board.

The cheapshot at TW before he ever even posted in this thread was very unwarranted and bad taste. I don't appreciate it in the politics threads (any of the cheap shots taken by anyone), but shit like that needs to stay in those threads. I generally stay away from them because I don't like all the personal attacks. I hate that the politics threads are so immature and unpleasant because of it,

Why does classicman post cheapshots? It works. It makes others (you) not challenge wacko politics. It makes you zone out. Wackoman was caught and exposed lying. Overt and intentional lying. He posted what the political agenda ordered him to believe: Tsonis’ paper as proof of global cooling. Then his lie was exposed by facts:
http://www.cellar.org/showthread.php...nic#post625815

This sudden climate change was not the point of his paper. Tsonis' paper is about a new simulation technique that maybe only applies to weather changed anthropogenically. Credibility is in the mathematics of his simulation - not in the simulation's result.

wackoman has ratcheted up his personal attacks to a frequency not seen since we had to discuss his family gonorrhea. Cheap shots. Lying. He even denies how his beloved president all but protected bin Laden. Classicman wants Obama to fail. To prove his reality – more aggressive insults and personal attacks.

It was necessary to be as nasty as classicman - to restore civility. Need we relive history? Unchallenged nastiness is how Hitler gained power. Classicman is doing what he was told to do. Nasty cheapshots work because others (ie morethanpretty) will zone out. Do not challenge his lies and personal attacks. Cheapshots work. This time his lies were flagrantly exposed in the Tsonis example. So he escalates his cheapshot attacks to now constant frequency. He forgets why it was necessary to discuss his family gonorrhea. A disease directly traceable to his political agenda.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by Sheldonrs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7zvGGSkLe0An interesting twist.

Yes, but you see that actress with downs syndrome isn't a politician trying to hustle a buck, so she's allowed to have a sense of humor.

[Sheldonrs]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Yes, but you see that actress with downs syndrome isn't a politician trying to hustle a buck, so she's allowed to have a sense of humor.

Ever been to a casting call? ALL actors are politicians trying to hustle a buck. lol!!!