|
|
|||||||
| Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
| View Poll Results: Well...how evolved are you? | |||
| Obedience/punishment |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| Self-interest |
  
|
1 | 7.69% |
| Interpersonal accord and conformity |
  
|
1 | 7.69% |
| Authority and social-order maintaining |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Social contract |
  
|
2 | 15.38% |
| Universal ethical principles |
  
|
5 | 38.46% |
| Already reached spiritual Nirvana |
|
0 | 0% |
| Still suck my thumb |
|
4 | 30.77% |
| Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-19-2008, 10:49 AM
|
#12 |
|
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
I forgot you asked for reasoning.
The druggist owns the drug. Heinz does not own the drug. To take the drug is stealing. Plain and simple. You have to have clear cut laws. The druggist is a jerk for not providing it for a more reasonable price, and could quite possible be run out of town for being so selfish. There is some expectation from a human point of view that the druggist would provide the drug for a more reasonable price, but he shouldn't be required by law to do that. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Threaded Mode