![]() |
So how evolved are you?
I got the idea for this thread from a post of our glorious leader in response to something Radar said.
Quote:
So where do you think you fit? |
I think everyone should follow the same ethical practices (or their equiv.) all the time.
|
is this poll for the male of the species?
;) |
"sex stages"?
|
I voted for interpersonal accord and conformity, for whatever its worth. Everyone is talking. But not everyone is voting...
Are these responses write-ins? |
I want to know more about the sex stages.
I personally am at the "too much of a gray area to choose one" stage. |
I have opposable thumbs
|
This thread reminds me of a book I once read, written in a language that I did not know.
|
If nobody looks at the Wikipedia entry I pointed to in the other thread, we can do this.
Please answer the following question, and give the reasoning behind your answer. Quote:
|
Good question.
No. Heinz had no right to break into the lab to steal the drug. If I was in the same situation, I would steal the drug, but expect to face any consequences for doing so. |
I forgot you asked for reasoning.
The druggist owns the drug. Heinz does not own the drug. To take the drug is stealing. Plain and simple. You have to have clear cut laws. The druggist is a jerk for not providing it for a more reasonable price, and could quite possible be run out of town for being so selfish. There is some expectation from a human point of view that the druggist would provide the drug for a more reasonable price, but he shouldn't be required by law to do that. |
~exactly~ what glatt said
|
Everything glatt said, plus more on this:
Quote:
Also, Heinz's punishment for the theft should fit the crime--since he's presumably already administered the drug and can't give it back, the punishment should be something along the lines of 'pay for it' (which Heinz already attempted to do, being willing to pay the other $1000 as soon as he could get it) and some additional deterrent, as determined to be appropriate by a jury of his peers (and not the druggist.) It goes without saying for me that the punishment should not be as bad as a dead wife. |
I agree completely with Clodfobble. If Heinz tells the truth about the druggist, he's welcome to do all he wants to get a furor going.
So here's a question. If the wife's problem happens to be contagious and becomes a widespread public health problem, would the government (or society) have a right to come in and take the drug and drug know-how from the druggist, pay him what it deems to be fair value, and distribute it to everyone that is sick? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.