![]() |
|
Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
I was simply offering my help to cloud and got lambasted for it - since the first post I have been like WTF did I do?
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
|
Quote:
Just messin' with you, classic. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Requoted from classicman’s citation:
Quote:
I asked classicman for his ‘whys’. Now obvious is why classicman promotes this myth. Camber and caster may not ‘hold’? Hold? What ‘unholds’ when no adjuster exists to move? Classicman knows only because others say so rather than asking a damn simple question. Where is that missing adjuster? Every 7500 kilometers, align a non-existent adjuster to correct movement that cannot exist? Or align to bent parts? How foolish. Classicman’s citation says why frequent $100 wheel alignment checks are wanton. Quote:
Classicman’s post – the ‘whys’ - explains how he knows frequent $100 checks are necessary. Those 1950 ‘high failure’ vehicles that classicman has assumed no longer exist. Cloud – ignore hyped fear from those who know only from myths. Also provides were symptoms that warn of problems without expensive $100 checking. Ie. fluid leaks, MPG numbers on every new tank of gas, moving car in a parking lot, Check Engine light, smoke, and routine inspection performed during each oil change. Expensive service plans, warranties, and $100 alignment checks every three months is not necessary with properly designed cars. A $100 alignment every 5000 kilometers? Is he that so naïve as to believe such people? This is why his reasons (supporting facts) were demanded. He does not know. He only reiterate what he reads. Another example of why ‘dirt under the fingernails’ is found where others learn. Shawnee - some people just know without first learning facts. They should be challenged aggressively as any good persons would - bluntly. This is not a debate about cars. There is no debate where people have learned simple technology. Cars don't require all that complex knowledge and frequent maintenance. Exposed are thos who know only because others say so. Thousands of web citations somehow is proof? The same logic also proved Saddam's WMDs. A minimally standard car requires so little maintenance. That is not even debateable. Debated is how some just believe these myths - forget to first learn facts - believe everything read on the web - don't ask damning, blunt, and politically incorrect questions. So where is that adjuster that needs $100 service every three months. Classicman cannot say. In the same place that George Jr put Saddam's WMDs. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Eliminate those myths and Cloud need not worry about a car - if the car is properly designed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|