The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-21-2007, 03:36 AM   #10
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by toranokaze View Post
There is nothing wrong with the belief that God created man.

Also there are some problems with evolution and it seams that if one can not question the theory without being labeled as a fool.
There has never been a theory that was taken to court or politicians before being accepted to classrooms.
It is an entirely organic process.
It is a trickle-down method.
A hypothesis is presented, or field-work is shown, lab work is done, peer-review is done to verify the work, the work is replicated and verified again, papers are published and reviewed, others repeat the work and review the original work. It begins to be taught at the PhD and graduate level, as it becomes accepted and the work is shown to be more and more accurate and lends itself to other work/fields it works its way all the way down to the elementary levels of schooling and texts... that is all.
All creationists/ID theorists have to do is present ANYTHING that does this and no one will question them.
Why are they going outside the science community to circumvent the entire process unless they have no valid claims, no valid theory?
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.