|
|
|||||||
| Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing |
| View Poll Results: which type of inteliigence is better? | |||
| Street Smarts |
   
|
2 | 14.29% |
| Book Smarts |
  
|
2 | 14.29% |
| Google Smarts |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 1337 Smarts |
  
|
1 | 7.14% |
| Other (Specify) |
  
|
9 | 64.29% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-23-2006, 01:25 PM
|
#15 |
|
Bioengineer and aspiring lawer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 872
|
How about the 'smatering of everything smarts'? If you're stuck squarely in only one catagory you're unlikely to come out ahead of someone who has mediocre abilities in many. Take the book smarts for example, if you can't interact with others or make good social decisions then at best you're going to be the bumbling professer who can't even keep his tie straight. If you're stuck in street smarts then you can't do anything that requires a complex skill.
__________________
The most valuable renewable resource is stupidity. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Threaded Mode