The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Philosophy (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Types of Intelligence (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=12490)

Flint 11-21-2006 01:35 PM

Types of Intelligence
 
People are often said to possess Street Smarts or Book Smarts. Much ado is made about which type is superior, and, conversely, alot of bustas be runnin' they mouth. I propose that there is a third catagory of smarts: Google Smarts. This is a person who has limited knowledge, but uses Street Smarts to appear to have Book Smarts.

Sundae 11-21-2006 01:46 PM

Google Smarts is the ability to talk knowledgeably about a subject until someone asks you a question.

Undertoad 11-21-2006 01:48 PM

People don't care about how smart you are. They only care what you can do for them.

skysidhe 11-21-2006 01:51 PM

I mind my own business smarts and take my vitamins smarts.

Shawnee123 11-21-2006 03:52 PM

Other:

Maxwell Smarts

OK, if you have book smarts you can read and comprehend street smarts assuming you get your hands on said book.

If you have street smarts, no amount of street learnin' is gonna give you book smarts, therefore you will be really street smart while you live in the street.

'Nuff said.

DanaC 11-21-2006 04:22 PM

Whichever smart is most appropriate for what you are seeking to do/be at any given time.

marichiko 11-21-2006 04:38 PM

Emotional smarts. That whole distance from the head to the heart thing. I used to be pretty book smart, but I was never emotionally very intelligent. I make really dumb decisions about people that give me nothing but grief, either sooner or later.

PS what's 1337 smarts?

Iggy 11-21-2006 05:13 PM

I would say a combonation of street smarts and book smarts. But the most important "smart" of all is common sense. Seems like too many are lacking common sense.

Oh, and I voted other.

fargon 11-21-2006 05:17 PM

Sexual smarts

Aliantha 11-21-2006 06:15 PM

This is the theory I prescribe to when I consider the intelligence of another person. Many of you will probably be familiar with gardner's theory, but for those of you who aren't, this is the abstract for an article about employing Gardners theory for educating blind children.

Abstract: Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences has provided educators with a new view of intelligence. It emphasizes that science, math and language are not the only ways to exhibit intelligence. People exhibit intelligence in many different ways. Each type of intelligence is as valuable as the others. Gardner classifies these intelligences into eight different areas: bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, spatial and natural intelligence. This paper reviews studies done for enhancing multiple intelligences in children who are blind. It also presents findings from brain research that supports the Theory of Multiple Intelligences and their implications in the field of teaching and learning. In addition, this paper provides a guide to modify curricular activities in the glance of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences. These activities are designed to improve different talents in children who are blind such as imagination, creativity, cooperation, social skills, self reflection, linguistic abilities, critical thinking, scientific thinking and attitudes towards nature. Examples of the teaching methods that are used to enhance these talents are: cooperation learning, guided imagery, brainstorming, questioning, scientific inquiry, projects-based learning, learning cycle, and some others. Sample lesson plans are provided in this paper.

lumberjim 11-21-2006 06:40 PM

Ouch. my deja vu bone!

DucksNuts 11-21-2006 08:15 PM

Chameleon smarts

I'm with Ibram on common sense *smarts* though, problem is its all perception

Cicero 11-21-2006 08:25 PM

I rely on books and gut instinct(intuition) whatever. I can't really tell you what is better per se. Just what I need.
I've also been mulling over wisdom being kindness- not IQ. Just thinking about it. Or maybe I just need to be kinder in general and it has nothing to do with IQ. See how smart I am? See- I have no idea. Don't use my methods you'll be just as confused as I am and make sense about everything.
*Note: Common sense is only for the common.

9th Engineer 11-23-2006 01:25 PM

How about the 'smatering of everything smarts'? If you're stuck squarely in only one catagory you're unlikely to come out ahead of someone who has mediocre abilities in many. Take the book smarts for example, if you can't interact with others or make good social decisions then at best you're going to be the bumbling professer who can't even keep his tie straight. If you're stuck in street smarts then you can't do anything that requires a complex skill.

Aliantha 11-23-2006 07:30 PM

What's wrong with bumbling professors who can't keep their ties straight?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.