![]() |
|
|||||||
| Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |||
|
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
There are several political candidates and pundits who are
advocating the elimination of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. I thought it might be worthwhile to try to have a discussion of these two entities, and the implications of keeping or eliminating them. Here is Freddie Mac's website description of what they do: Quote:
Marketplace Liquidity Quote:
Instead, a mortgage is developed by a bank, credit union, etc. wherein the terms of the loan are defined, and the purchase funds are distributed to the new home owner. Before the existence of F&F, the bank provided it's own funds and held the mortgage and processed the loan payments. But with F&F, the bank can now sell such mortgages to F&F, and thereby replenish the bank's funds to continue creating additional mortgages. But, F&F do not buy these mortgages one-at-a-time. Instead, the bank "bundles" several mortgages and establishes the "quality" of the bundle, and then proceeds to negotiate the value with F&F. Once F&F own these bundles of mortgages, they sell them to investors, with assurances of value and quality... and may earn a profit during these transactions. ------------ OK, I hope other Dwellars will add or correct my description as needed, and contribute to a political discussion of these institutions. . |
|||
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|