The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2008, 09:53 AM   #1
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by skysidhe View Post
Problem is I don't BELIEVE Obama. I don't believe in him. I don't understand the vague ambiguities that come out of his mouth. I can't stand his smirky face.His finger flipping, lipstick poking politics.
Then you must also hate McCain for same reasons.

Your emotions should never be reason for such decisions. Making a decision on how you 'feel' makes one the perfect patsy for Rush Limbaugh logic. How to get the naive to vote for you? Get them to think using emotion - decisions only based in first impressions. And yes, that is racism. Racism is not about race. Racism is also judging people only on first impressions.

McCain campaign has absorbed the George Jr wackos who, for example, got the VP selection changed to someone who represents wacko extremist agendas. Do you want someone who promotes the party agenda only because you feel?

George Sr had the same problem. He very much disliked the wacko extremists who eventually took major positions in his administration. He, like McCain, had no choice. Party power is located mostly among wackos which is why moderates (such as Sen Collins of Maine) survive with so little party support.

Do you want George Jr people in power? You get them when voting for McCain. Same people who cause George Sr so much aggravation. Same people who George Sr would not have had if given the choice.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 12:33 PM   #2
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
Then you must also hate McCain for same reasons.
I dislike both of them for pretty much the same reasons. First of all they are politicians and secondly, since getting the "nod" the extremists in both parties are now involved in their respective campaigns exponentially more than at the beginning. The leftist extremists are just as bad as the righty tighties.

What is your opinion of the top leftist whackos? I hate to assume this, but it seems as though you only shoot at the right and not both.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 07:57 PM   #3
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
What is your opinion of the top leftist whackos? I hate to assume this, but it seems as though you only shoot at the right and not both.
Wackos from either side get the contempt they earn. However the lefty wackos were not sending corporate welfare to their chosen companies and religious groups, were not subverting any effort to avert 11 September, were not assigning White House lawyers to rewrite science to properly reflect their political agenda, were not hyping a pathetic man to Mars program only for the glory of their administration, did not try to kill the Hubble Space Telescope, did not stifle fundamental medical science (ie stem cells) only to impose their religion on mankind, did not lower the income of Americans while massively enriching the few richest, were not inventing myths (ie Saddam's involvement on 11 Sept) only to promote more war, did not lie about the massive debts and the resulting recession that must result, did not keep spending massively on 'rebate' programs to only make themselves look good, did not subvert education with "more children left behind" nonsense, did not endorse interference with Terry Schiavo, did not keep American drug prices 40% higher and impose a cost on Medicaid that will only massively increase more entitlements (measured in $trillions over ten years), did not routinely wiretap everyone in some mythical fear that we all conspire to perform terrorism, did not subvert mileage standards so that engineers in the auto industry are further stifled by the bean counters, did not openly conduct torture and international kidnapping - and deny it, did not impose illegal tariffs to protect anti-American big steel while destroying jobs in the productive steel reprocessing industry, did not go to California for a campaign fund raiser when everyone knew a category five hurricane would strike New Orleans, subverted the HAVA standards for electronic voting machines, denied damage to New Orleans for over five days while people had no food or water in the SuperDome and Convention Center (and while the USS Bataan sat only miles away forbidden to offer assistance), did not subvert writ of Habeas Corpus, did not unilaterally subvert numerous international treaties as to all but restart the cold war, did not subvert anti-aids programs in Africa so at to impose wacko extremists Christian beliefs, did not stifle American aid to tsunami victims even with the USS Abraham Lincoln sitting nearby in Hong Kong and unable to provide assistance for five days, did not try to create a shooting war with China over a silly spy plane, did not alienate every American ally including Mexico, Canada and even the 90% approval rating in Turkey smashed to single digits, did not subvert the Carter plan to bring N Korea back into the world on some myth called 'axis of evil', did not earn contempt from virtually the entire JAG, did not increase pork barrel legislation by a factor of ten, did not virtually destroy readiness of American arm forces including the elimination of the once always considered essential Division Ready Brigade, ...

Just a few of the reasons off the top as to why right wing wacko extremists are so dumb and so anti-American.

My complaint with wacko extremist left? They remained mute while all this was ongoing.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2008, 10:40 PM   #4
skysidhe
~~Life is either a daring adventure or nothing.~~
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
I dislike both of them for pretty much the same reasons. First of all they are politicians and secondly, since getting the "nod" the extremists in both parties are now involved in their respective campaigns exponentially more than at the beginning. The leftist extremists are just as bad as the righty tighties.
Exactly.

There is 10% of us who will vote based on who makes their hand shake less when attempting to check their box on Nov.4th.
skysidhe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2008, 09:14 AM   #5
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by skysidhe View Post
There is 10% of us who will vote based on who makes their hand shake less when attempting to check their box on Nov.4th.
As AIG was crashing, McCain read directly from the script written by his new staff. "Our economy is sound" - a direct quote from what his new staff had written for George Jr. Well McCain realized his mistake later in that day and stopped reading that speech. But the speech was written by those who now run his campaign - the same people who designed political strategy for George Jr.

"Our economy was not sound" according to those who were trying to avoid an economic meltdown. But McCain was quoting the exact same phrase - word for word - that George Jr said. Does that sound like change - or that McCain's staff is now subverted with George Jr wacko extremists?
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2008, 09:48 AM   #6
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by skysidhe View Post
I wanted Hillary as Pres. I am protesting but it won't be a protest vote, nor a color of the skin vote. It's a look at the facts about whom has done what.
Quote:
Originally Posted by skysidhe View Post
There is 10% of us who will vote based on who makes their hand shake less when attempting to check their box on Nov.4th.
I simply don't understand positions like yours. In the political spectrum, Hillary is much closer to Obama than to McCain. Did you support Hillary because of her politics, or for some other reason?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skysidhe View Post
I understand who is to blame and those who did it. I think deregulation is wrong. I always thought so. I can even say, "I told you so" to those who bashed me for bashing Bush' Waay back when but anyway, I didn't like Bush then and I still don't. I still am democratic in my basic philosophy but these parties are so in the pockets of special interests on both sides.l
The republicans are the party that has pushed deregulation, and much of what they have deregulated has turned to piles of stinking poo because greedy robber barons end up thriving and screwing us. The Savings and Loans in the 80s, the the rolling blackouts in California and the fall of Enron, and now the banks.

What about the Savings and Loans debacle in the 80's? McCain was one of the Keating Five who took campaign contributions in exchange for obstructing the investigation into one of the failed Savings and Loans. Do you really want a member of the Keating Five to try to lead us out of this mess?

Obama on the other hand, has no such skeletons in his closet. And he is tapping a lot of the top economic advisers who worked under Bill Clinton. I miss the Clinton years. The economy was very strong then, we had peace, and the government even had a surplus.

Looking at both campaigns this past week, it seems that Obama is better. Neither candidate has much more information that what they read in the paper, so they can't really say what they can do to lead us out of this mess. Obama has basically said that he's in no position to second guess the Fed and Treasury and has kept his mouth shut, and McCain is running around saying he'll fire people, no wait, he'll just see about getting rid of them, he'll appoint a 9/11 commission. He opposes, no wait, he now supports the bailout of AIG and then finally settles down and takes the same position as Obama to just let the Fed and Treasury do their jobs.


As far as the topic of this thread goes, I think we have no choice but to bail out these banks, but I don't like it. I'd like to see some sort of strings attached, like increased regulation. And maybe putting the CEOs in pillories on Wall Street for a day or two so we can all go by and kick them in the ass.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2008, 10:49 AM   #7
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
And maybe putting the CEOs in pillories on Wall Street for a day or two so we can all go by and kick them in the ass.
That means each would be paid about $100,000 per ass kick. That is a solution?

Chance are a member of his entourage will take his place anyway.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2008, 07:33 PM   #8
skysidhe
~~Life is either a daring adventure or nothing.~~
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
I simply don't understand positions like yours. In the political spectrum, Hillary is much closer to Obama than to McCain. Did you support Hillary because of her politics, or for some other reason?
I supported her for the issues and I believed she could actually deliver and get something done.

Other than that I don't know. It's a conundrum and I am probably not the best person to dispel a mystery. I can tell you I have done some soul searching for deep seated feminist issues to see if I have a crooked need for a tangerine pantsuit :P


I did like Obama's interview with reporters today. I have been waiting for the debates.I wish we could have had an oportunity to see townhall debates so the remaining fence sitters would know for sure who to vote for. Things could change for me during the debates. We shall see.

I want to see them both off the cuff because these political soundbites, gaffs and talking heads don't tell me anything.

I like the prudence I saw today during the bailout hearings on both political parties.
That's all I know.


TW- Im not ignoring you. It's just that your responses to me are way over what I want to get into. Thanks tho.
skysidhe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.