iPod Nano

ashke • Sep 23, 2005 12:35 am
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/wo/StoreReentry.wo?family=iPodx&siteID=4J3P6VcoUvE-7bFm3rp4h5TAgAI0L%2Ftjyw

Has anyone seen this? It's so thin...
Bullitt • Sep 23, 2005 1:33 am
i don't care if it has a metal back to it.. i know i'd find some way of breaking the dang thing in half
ashke • Sep 23, 2005 2:19 am
Do your gadgets need a lot of protective gear or something?
Bullitt • Sep 23, 2005 2:31 am
no, they just need to not have the physical properties of vanilla whafers..
Image
Image
ashke • Sep 23, 2005 3:08 am
I wonder how tough the Nano is... Didn't some cellarist say in another iPod thread how they threw their iPods into the washing machine and it came out alright? (Were they exaggerating?)
Happy Monkey • Sep 23, 2005 7:25 am
Here's an extensive stress test.
perth • Sep 23, 2005 10:14 am
My iPod Shuffle went through the washer and dryer and came out fine. Of course the damn thing died on me the other day. I'm not sure if it had anything to do with it's deep-cleaning, because it worked for so long afterwards.
Bullitt • Sep 23, 2005 10:22 am
Here's another extensive stress test
dar512 • Sep 23, 2005 10:35 am
Browse the mp3 player reviews at amazon. Every single one I've looked at has at least one bad review saying the thing broke some short time after it was purchased. I'm wondering if the technology is really ready in this area - or perhaps the effort to make them so light has made them less durable?

I dunno. But it's one of the reasons I've held off from getting a player.
Bullitt • Sep 23, 2005 10:49 am
any product with lots of parts will always have a few that just break due to poor craftsmanship on that particular item, just a bad batch of plastic from their supplier, a robotic arm that solders the chips incorrectly calibrated for just a few boards on the line, any number of reasons. There will never be a perfect consistantly functioning product, esp. not an mp3 player, in my opinion. You just have to take what your given and deal with it, hoping that improvements will be made where they can be.
Undertoad • Sep 23, 2005 11:18 am
You know, the Nano is so perfectly positioned as a Christmas killer... I can't imagine them not selling a million in the fall.

Apple has outdone themselves wrt marketing. Apple marketing is genius. It is near ideal. The smartest and best marketers on the planet work for Apple.
glatt • Sep 23, 2005 11:23 am
Undertoad wrote:
You know, the Nano is so perfectly positioned as a Christmas killer... I can't imagine them not selling a million in the fall.

Apple has outdone themselves wrt marketing. Apple marketing is genius. It is near ideal. The smartest and best marketers on the planet work for Apple.


Absolutely true. But it sure helps to have a good product to market.
Undertoad • Sep 23, 2005 11:52 am
There is 1% difference between Apple's product and any other player on the market. A 1% that doesn't really justify an additional $100 in price, but... marketing!

$199 for a 2GB flash player? Why? My 40GB Creative Nomad Zen Xtra was that price a YEAR ago. (Better battery life than an iPod, but the user interface is on the side of the unit and not the front.)
glatt • Sep 23, 2005 1:16 pm
Apple products have always had an emphasis on the user interface along with a larger price tag. Is that marketing, or design? Or both?
Undertoad • Sep 23, 2005 1:28 pm
You know, I don't the first thing about the innards of the company, but I would guess... I would guess that there is no separation between the two parts, as there is in every other company. At least Jobs has a unified vision of it, as well as a relentless focus on strategy for the future.

I don't buy the products because I am tough on prices. But I am a big admirer of the company. I would love to get a Mac mini.
Griff • Sep 23, 2005 2:09 pm
Anybody have an opinion on what company has the best competition for the Shuffle? Dell is pushing one with a screen for the same price and claims it compresses music more efficiently for more tunes.
mbpark • Sep 26, 2005 8:52 pm
Griff,

Before my fiancee was given a 1GB Shuffle by someone, we were seriously looking at the iRiver because of its external microphone jack and expandability. It also can use Windows Media Player, which isn't bad given the competition :).

I would stay far away from any device requiring either MusicMatch Jukebox, Creative Labs, or Sony software to load the mp3s onto the device. I've found those three to be the most horrible out there. I remember when Apple had to bundle MusicMatch with iTunes. I bought XPlay, and so did 3 people I know, due to how bad MusicMatch is. Dell uses MusicMatch, from what I remember. Sony, for all the good walkmans I owned, has put out garbage for software.

Pretty much anything else seems like a pale imitation, especially anything Creative Labs sells.

Mitch
Griff • Sep 26, 2005 8:56 pm
thanks, Mitch :)
superbaton • Sep 26, 2005 11:02 pm
my nanooooooo
:shocking:
superbaton • Sep 26, 2005 11:04 pm
more
seakdivers • Sep 27, 2005 12:39 pm
Dude - you need to clean your mouse!
melidasaur • Sep 27, 2005 12:56 pm
All of these new iPods are messing my iPod up... all of the software updates and such... I like to think I made the iPod cool since I got mine a long time ago!
russotto • Sep 27, 2005 9:45 pm
Undertoad wrote:
$199 for a 2GB flash player? Why? My 40GB Creative Nomad Zen Xtra was that price a YEAR ago. (Better battery life than an iPod, but the user interface is on the side of the unit and not the front.)


The extra cost is justifiable mostly because the iPod nano doesn't HAVE a side (ok, slight exaggeration). And, of course, being a flash player, it's skip-proof.
Undertoad • Sep 27, 2005 10:40 pm
Point is you could get a 3GB Archos flash player for $150.
dar512 • Sep 28, 2005 9:42 am
Maybe it is possible to be too thin. Apple to replace cracked screens.