alphabet

xoxoxoBruce • Jan 28, 2019 2:15 am
Alphabet, from whom all phrases flow;
Learn it, all you students here below;
Praise above, all the books you’ve read;
Do it, or teacher will smack your head.
tw • Jan 28, 2019 10:29 am
What is a Betabet?
xoxoxoBruce • Jan 28, 2019 12:09 pm
Damifino, where is a betabet?
Happy Monkey • Jan 28, 2019 12:25 pm
What's the "too" at the bottom? It doesn't seem to be in the original.
xoxoxoBruce • Jan 28, 2019 1:15 pm
The waw in Proto-Sinaitic evolved into the F and also the U.
Happy Monkey • Jan 28, 2019 1:20 pm
heh
Gravdigr • Jan 28, 2019 3:14 pm
tw;1024322 wrote:
What is a Betabet?


It's the test release of the gammabet.
Griff • Jan 28, 2019 5:41 pm
neat
Glinda • Jan 28, 2019 5:42 pm
It's interesting to me that the Romans seem to have reversed (flipped left to right) many letters to suit their own devices. Uncreative bastards!!
Happy Monkey • Jan 28, 2019 6:27 pm
They seem to have reversed EVERY non-symmetrical letter. I wonder if there was some sort of engraving system involved, where an inscription in one clay tablet could be dried out, and then pressed on another clay tablet to copy it.

This link implies that (at least sometimes) archaic Latin/greek was written right-to-left. The hardened engravings would travel better, but be reversed, while the soft clay ones would be considered more disposable.
tw • Jan 30, 2019 4:08 pm
I was hoping to get to the end of it with a Zetabet. Only to discover there is an Etabet and Thetabet. Iota hope it eventually gets resolved.
sexobon • Jan 30, 2019 5:52 pm
All bets are off.
Gravdigr • Jan 31, 2019 11:15 am
Don't bet on it.
Glinda • Jan 31, 2019 11:36 am
Happy Monkey;1024358 wrote:
They seem to have reversed EVERY non-symmetrical letter. I wonder if there was some sort of engraving system involved, where an inscription in one clay tablet could be dried out, and then pressed on another clay tablet to copy it.

This link implies that (at least sometimes) archaic Latin/greek was written right-to-left. The hardened engravings would travel better, but be reversed, while the soft clay ones would be considered more disposable.


Of course this makes total sense.

But I think it's more likely that the Romans was just a bunch'a lazy, syphilitic bitches.

:biggrinje
xoxoxoBruce • Feb 1, 2019 6:58 am
Wes Anderson's