Embarrassing astronomy news

Pete Zicato • Oct 12, 2011 3:03 pm
Embarrassing news.
BigV • Oct 12, 2011 3:06 pm
Not that there's anything wrong with that...
Spexxvet • Oct 12, 2011 6:57 pm
The cosmos is not sorry about uranus
GunMaster357 • Oct 16, 2011 9:02 am
Did they ever read that title aloud before releasing the article?

:lol:
Sundae • Oct 16, 2011 9:05 am
Given the rest of the article, I think that was the point...
jimhelm • Oct 16, 2011 9:29 am
uranus has been pounded not once, but twice!
ZenGum • Oct 16, 2011 8:01 pm
And just how did Saturn get such a big ring?
infinite monkey • Oct 17, 2011 9:23 am
ZenGum;764254 wrote:
And just how did Saturn get such a big ring?


By mooning over Uranus.
ZenGum • Oct 17, 2011 10:49 pm
No facial comet shots?
Trilby • Oct 18, 2011 7:25 am
:lol:

thanks, you nut cakes, for making me laugh this morning.
ZenGum • Oct 18, 2011 10:36 pm
ZenGum;764254 wrote:
And just how did Saturn get such a big ring?


infinite monkey;764333 wrote:
By mooning over Uranus.


Close, it was by using ass-steroids.
Lamplighter • Oct 24, 2011 8:16 pm
CBS News
October 24, 2011 6:57 PM
2,000-year-old stellar mystery solved
Astronomers finally know why the first documented supernova was super-sized.
The exploded star was observed by the ancient Chinese
in the year 185, and visible for eight months.
It was later found to be a bigger-than-expected supernova remnant,
8,000 light years away.


Fine and good. The Chinese did see the supernova in 185 CE.

But how about sightings in other cultures of that time ?
I found images of a pictograph of a supernova (?) by the Anasazi
in the Four Corners area of the US, but that was in the 1200's CE
I've also seen one reference to cave drawings in Guam, but no date.

Wouldn't you think more cultures would have left evidence
of this or other supernovae events ?
.
jimhelm • Oct 24, 2011 8:23 pm
like the star of Bethlehem you mean?
Lamplighter • Oct 24, 2011 9:03 pm
Maybe so !
Lamplighter • Jul 18, 2012 2:51 pm
300 inches here and 300 inches there...

LA Times
Thomas H. Maugh II
July 18, 2012

Pioneer spacecraft 'anomaly' solved, and it's not new physics
Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 were launched in 1972 and 1973, respectively,
on a trajectory toward the edge of the solar system. In the early 1980s,
controllers at NASA's JPL detected a slight deceleration in the crafts' speeds.
The effect was initially dismissed as resulting from leftover propellant in the fuel lines,
but it persisted much longer than could be accounted for by such a cause.
In 1998, John Anderson of JPL and his colleagues calculated that the craft
had a deceleration rate of about 300 inches per day.

Because they had no explanation for the slowing, the team speculated
that it might be caused by some new physics that contradicted
Einstein's general theory of relativity.<snip>

...they were able to calculate the amount of heat generated by the electrical
subsystems of the craft and the decay of plutonium in the power sources.
They concluded that the radiation of that heat in the direction of
the spacecraft's travel was sufficient to explain the slight deceleration.

"The effect is something like when you are driving a car and
the photons from your headlights are pushing you backward," Turyshev said.
[COLOR="DarkRed"]"It's very subtle."[/COLOR]