busterb • Dec 18, 2010 9:44 pm
Obama Signs CALM Act on Volume of TV Commercials
But, But some can opt out if can show a hardship. Another feel good law. F$#k
But, But some can opt out if can show a hardship. Another feel good law. F$#k
That 'increase the volume with commercials' was the number one FCC complaint every year since 2000. This 'constant volume' requirement has been an ongoing solution in the FCC only in the past two years. It took that long to finally get it implemented for the same reasons why Republicans also want to subvert net neutrality.Lamplighter;700833 wrote:I hope it's as effective as the "Do Not Call" registry has been.
busterb;700827 wrote:But, But some can opt out if can show a hardship. Another feel good law. F$#k
tw;700853 wrote:That 'increase the volume with commercials' was the number one FCC complaint every year since 2000. This 'constant volume' requirement has been an ongoing solution in the FCC only in the past two years. It took that long to finally get it implemented for the same reasons why Republicans also want to subvert net neutrality.
Broadcasters charged more for commercials that were aired with audio volume increased. Therefore would purchase politicians to protect that income.
Sundae Girl;701074 wrote:
If I'm up when the 'rents are in bed I am constantly watching for the white square in the corner of the screen that signals adverts are coming, ..
Projectionists would watch for that signal. That is when the next movie reel was started.Sundae Girl;701084 wrote:There's a tiny white square on the top right hand side of the screen, and a flickering one on the left.