Radioactive Superconductors

Flint • Aug 13, 2008 10:25 am
Scientists at MIT have created the world’s first radioactive superconductor--a paradox which has left many in the scientific community scratching their heads in confusion.

In the first stage of production, a unique blend of eleven radioactive substances are slowly introduced into a sealed chamber, where they display a natural aversion to sharing the same space with their unstable cousins. Next, high pressure is applied to the chamber, forcing their outbursts of subatomic particles to become entangled. The compression of the substances creates a condition of extreme heat and dangerous instability, which is then quickly reversed with a new high speed flash-freezing process. The resulting snapshot of radioactive chaos is instantaneously subjected to an intense electromagnetic field, polarizing the entangled particles into a functional magnetic circuit.

What happens next is something that nobody expected. When the materials are brought back up to a temperature just slightly above absolute zero, the sloughing off of radioactive particles resumes, but with a twist--the circuit retains its closed state, although nobody is quite sure how this is possible. It is this unique property that is leading some to believe that these so-called “radioactive semiconductors” are the missing link needed to create fully functional quantum computers.

The substance, dubbed Obtanium, is under consideration to be included as a new element on the periodic chart, although it will be difficult to classify due to its non-specific nature. Proponents of Obtanium research are expressing outrage over rumours that the US Military is planning to deploy Obtanium-tipped artillery shells in the Iraq conflict.
Flint • Aug 13, 2008 12:38 pm
Sorry, forgot to embed the link.

I'm not sure they've done a very good job of explaining this.
DanaC • Aug 13, 2008 1:02 pm
This is so exciting! I've been following (though with very little actual understanding lol) the drive towards quantum computers with great interest.
Undertoad • Aug 13, 2008 1:13 pm
Uh.. I thought it was "Bobtanium"? Because one of the main scientists was named Robert.
Griff • Aug 13, 2008 1:25 pm
Superconductor's unstable cousin.
HungLikeJesus • Aug 13, 2008 2:14 pm
Flint;475872 wrote:
Sorry, forgot to embed the link.

I'm not sure they've done a very good job of explaining this.


They seem to have moved the page.
Flint • Aug 13, 2008 3:12 pm
HungLikeJesus;475907 wrote:
They seem to have moved the page.
Maybe because the "powers that be" don't want us to know about this? This could change everything.
regular.joe • Aug 13, 2008 3:12 pm
Very interesting. I'm wondering how the substances were decided upon, and why the experiment was done in the first place.
DanaC • Aug 13, 2008 5:11 pm
For shits and giggles? :P
Undertoad • Aug 13, 2008 5:19 pm
That's what they put on their Grant application.
Elspode • Aug 13, 2008 8:43 pm
I guess I lack foresight. The only application for this that came to my mind was glow in the dark icecubes to make your drink easier to find.
regular.joe • Aug 13, 2008 11:10 pm
This has been bugging me since I read it the first time.


Flint, is this some kind of an April fools joke, only it's not April? Obtanium? A flash freeze process to absolute zero? This has got to be a joke.
Undertoad • Aug 13, 2008 11:15 pm
It's Bobtanium, I tell you!!
ZenGum • Aug 14, 2008 12:13 am
I am a bit sceptical about some of what is described here - especially "are brought back up to a temperature just slightly above absolute zero". Brought BACK UP to SLIGHTLY above ABSOLUTE ZERO??? Where was it before?
On the other hand, there is some crazy stuff that actually happens when you push known materials into extreme conditions. Could be.

But "radioactive superconductors" would be a cool band name.
Flint • Aug 14, 2008 10:55 am
Like I said, I think the staff writer here sort of fumbled explaining this. Maybe the editor, I don't know. But it's still exciting news for all the science geeks out there.
FYREDEUS • Aug 15, 2008 3:07 am
http://beta.audiogalaxy.com/pages/thread.php?&t=5524
Sundae • Aug 15, 2008 6:49 am
For those not inclined to read blind links, the above is an admission that someone on AG just made it up.

For shits and giggles one would assume.
regular.joe • Aug 15, 2008 8:23 am
UT was right all along. Bobtanium.
Undertoad • Aug 15, 2008 9:34 am
How can you say that Bobtanium is fake!

Here is a picture of the researcher in question

Image

Full name J.R. "Bob" Dobbs
Flint • Aug 15, 2008 9:35 am
[color=white] "someone on AG" = NosotrosFlintamos[/color]
regular.joe • Aug 15, 2008 11:14 pm
I heard that Professor Brainard uses Bobtanium in flubber.
ZenGum • Aug 15, 2008 11:19 pm
Of course ... Obtainium .... "get it" ... it's a joke ... GET IT?
Duh.
Flint • Aug 15, 2008 11:36 pm
Also, the stuff is made basically the same way as KFC chicken.
Flint • Aug 24, 2008 10:49 pm
Here's what I eventually admitted about this, from this thread on AudioGalaxy:
NosotrosFlintamos wrote:
I thought of the term "radioactive superconductors" while I was in the shower, where my mind wanders. I wondered what they might be, what they might do, how they might be made, and how they might be described. Then I typed it all up when I got to work (it's amazing that I remembered, but the term was stuck in my head for some reason) and the rest is history.


And this, from later in the thread:

FYREDEUS wrote:
If one thinks deception is 'good fun' JOIN A LIARS CLUB. From the way Noso described them in the last few days "the Cellar" is one...IF hes telling the truth about THAT then there's a place one can go and wink-wink-nudge-nudge and be all self congratulatory about a blase jaded 'sophisticate' indifference to truth and honour all one wants if you think thats 'cool'.


I don't know...is The Cellar a "LIARS CLUB" ??? Are we indifferent to "truth and horour" ???
ZenGum • Aug 24, 2008 11:43 pm
We are indifferent to truth and honour.
but...
Holy crap! There's a traitor in our midst!!!!
DanaC • Aug 25, 2008 2:42 pm
Truth? Honour? Meh.
DanaC • Aug 25, 2008 2:43 pm
Flint, wtf have you been saying about the Cellar for the FYREDEUS asstard to come to that conclusion?




* Not having the first clue about science, I thought it sounded feasible. Some of the projects to try and develop nano-computers and so on sound no more or less plausible than this one to me lol.
Flint • Aug 25, 2008 2:52 pm
DanaC;478038 wrote:
Flint, wtf have you been saying about the Cellar for the FYREDEUS asstard to come to that conclusion?


I ctrl+F'ed some recent AG threads for mention of The Cellar, and found none. Then I remembered the Radioactive Superconductors thread on Soundchain:

15.08.08
FYREDEUS - re: Radioactive Superconductors
I don't go to the Cellar but see hes tried to hoax them too...this time with a phony non-working [of course] link to make it look more credible.


15.08.08
Flint. - re: Radioactive Superconductors
The Cellar thread is interesting because people are "playing along" i.e. making it clear, between the lines, that they know it was a joke, but not ruining the joke for anybody else.
DanaC • Aug 25, 2008 2:55 pm
The Cellar thread is interesting because people are "playing along" i.e. making it clear, between the lines, that they know it was a joke, but not ruining the joke for anybody else.

Seriously, nobody noticed that they make the stuff like KFC chicken; using a secret blend of 11 herbs and spices and a pressure cooker?



lol, I didn't read the article.
Pooka • Aug 25, 2008 5:22 pm
It looks as though some of you are beginning to come to the realization that Flint is in actuality... Bob...

Image

This revelation should resolve many of your questions.... for those of you who doubt... research the church of the Subgenius and consider what you know of Flint... your eyes will be opened and you too will become a believer...
regular.joe • Aug 25, 2008 9:07 pm
...I want to believe.../insert: Xfiles music/