Now Printer and scanner

busterb • Oct 17, 2006 8:09 pm
Am look for new printer. I’ve had it with HP’s. Last one I got at bigbox is an hp c3100 all-in-one. If you set up to print something from word, then have to change the setting on printer. I have about a week to return.
Looking at this one http://www.officedepot.com/ddSKU.do?level=SK&id=158702&No=10&Nr=200000&N=255878&An=browse
I don’t print much, and little in color. With my new camera that might change.

Also looking at FB scanners.
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=7918471&st=hp+scanjet+4370+photo+scanner+l1970&lp=4&type=product&cp=1&id=1149208602889 and this one.

http://www.officedepot.com/ddSKU.do?level=SK&id=200864&N=255893&An=browse
Any tips?


Thanks bb
xoxoxoBruce • Oct 17, 2006 8:40 pm
I've got a couple of HP flatbeds. The up side is they can scan printed material into editable text which is wonderful. I don't know if any other scanner does that. The downside is the software is huge, bigger than huge, and bundled up with a lot of crap I don't want.
The people grumbling on the web claim there's no stripped down versions of the software like many scanners have, for commercial applications.

I am still using my original printer, an HP895Cse, and was figuring out last week, I've put at least 20,000 sheets of paper through it. That's not a typo. :eek:
Clodfobble • Oct 17, 2006 11:11 pm
Sorry to hear the HPs didn't work out for you, buster... I've had the same little 722C since 1996 and it's never failed me.
SteveDallas • Oct 18, 2006 12:23 am
busterb wrote:
I don’t print much, and little in color. With my new camera that might change.


Hmmm I guess it depends on how little "little" is. Have you considered a low-end monochrome laser? They'll beat an inkjet on cost per page any day. Also YMMV but I personally found with everybody offering 4x6 prints for 19 cents each, I can't make one at home for that little--by the time you consider the ink, paper, time, redos from screwups, etc., and also the fact that I'm just not convinced consumer inkjet prints are going to last as much as good Fuji or Kodak photo-process prints. So now I don't do hardly any photo printing at home, and if/when I buy another printer I'm not sure I'll bother to get color.

My only advice is take a hard look at your ink costs before buying anything. Epsons have a great rep with photographers, at least the higher end ones do, but Canon makes some very nice ones too.
mbpark • Oct 18, 2006 1:32 am
You really want a monochrome laser printer. You do. The cost per page is so much less than an inkjet that it's not even comparable. We're running an HP Laserjet at home that has needed toner once. It was $50.

The scanner...I'd recommend a Canon flatbed that's powered by USB. They have excellent build quality, and since they're powered off the USB port, they have one less cable.

You can use the money you'll save on toner on OmniPage Pro 15 and get everything looking right and be able to convert PDFs to editable text at the same time :).

Thanks,

Mitch
WabUfvot5 • Oct 18, 2006 4:41 am
B+W laser is only feasible if you print a lot or you print tiny text. If busterb wants to do photos I'd stick with inkjet despite how shoddily and poorly they are made.
busterb • Oct 18, 2006 10:03 am
I have an old HP 832C that was working when I stored it, will see if I can dust it off. Hate to buy ink and not work.
Bullitt • Oct 18, 2006 10:53 am
My Dell printer has pretty much sucked at life since I got it.. I would lean towards Canon when this thing finally burns out just because they build quality products and don't make you give blood to pay for em.
Elspode • Oct 18, 2006 11:02 am
I've worked with HP inkjets almost exclusively both personal and at work for 15 years now, and the malfunction rate is vastly below that of almost every other computer product I've ever used.
dar512 • Oct 18, 2006 1:32 pm
I bought a low-end laser printer last year after I read on a website the difference in cost-per-page for laser over inkjet. At the time, they were saying 11-13 cents per page for inkjet as opposed to 2-3 cents per page for laser.

So I've trained wife-of-dar and daughters-of-dar to use the laser unless they really need color.

I got a reconditioned Brother from buy.com for $115.
BigV • Oct 18, 2006 1:40 pm
Two thumbs up for HP as well.

Their stuff works.

However. xoB's observation that the software suffers from... bloat. Yeah, well, understatement is all I can say. And the install routine can be picky. Short answer: install the software first. FIRST. Then cable and power the printer. Much gnashing of teeth and pulling of hair will be avoided.

Point of order: You should let your intended use of the printer drive your choices more than any other single factor. And the recent addition of the digicam makes me think that a monochrome laser, while superior in all the respect listed above, would not be suitable for printing pictures. Quality, ok, color, no.

Anyway, it's truetruetrue that you'll pay far more for ink over the life of the printer than you will for everything else combined, including the cost of the printer. That's an important consideration. I'm happy with our HP officejet d145 at home and I refill the ink tanks myself, cause I'm cheap. But the new cartridges are not.
xoxoxoBruce • Oct 19, 2006 1:21 am
Big V, when you refill the cartriges, do you fill them or just put a small amount in? Like the equivalent of what they were suppose to come with. :confused:
tw • Oct 19, 2006 2:14 am
mbpark wrote:
You really want a monochrome laser printer. You do. The cost per page is so much less than an inkjet that it's not even comparable. We're running an HP Laserjet at home that has needed toner once. It was $50.
Long ago, we did an estimate of cost for a laser printer. It came to something like 1.x cents per page (plus cost of paper)? Do you have a better (current) number?
Elspode • Oct 19, 2006 2:24 pm
xoxoxoBruce wrote:
Big V, when you refill the cartriges, do you fill them or just put a small amount in? Like the equivalent of what they were suppose to come with. :confused:

The first time I tried refilling my black cartridge, it worked fabulously well. The second time, it was an unmitigated disaster.

I have yet to successfully refill a single color cartridge despite multiple attempts.
Elspode • Oct 19, 2006 2:25 pm
I will also second the utility and cost-effectiveness of our Brother multifunction device. To keep it as cheap as absolutely possible, we refill the toner and use the drum/toner cartridge at least thrice, without noticable deterioration in print quality...FWIW.
busterb • Oct 19, 2006 9:48 pm
This’s what I got, not wanted. But I’ll give them a try.
http://www.officedepot.com/ddSKU.do?level=SK&id=200864&N=255893&An=browse
http://www.officedepot.com/ddSKU.do?level=SK&id=158702&No=10&Nr=200000&N=255878&An=browse
Plus a card reader that I can’t find on Google, except at officedepot, makes ya wonder.
BigV • Oct 20, 2006 12:32 pm
xoxoxoBruce wrote:
Big V, when you refill the cartriges, do you fill them or just put a small amount in? Like the equivalent of what they were suppose to come with. :confused:
Short answer: Both.

Longer answer: They only come with about 10 to 20 ml of ink in the larger tanks. Just checked. My printer, HP OfficeJet d145 takes a black cartridge #14. 26 milliters. not. very. much. ink. Unless you spill some then it's like the black plague. What makes my task easier is that the syringes that came with the refill kit are graduated. I can see how much I'm putting in. Plus, I only refill it til I can see the top of the packing material look wet. Then I stop. It's never the case that I can put another 26 mls back in the tank. By the way, my printer does use tanks of ink separate from the print heads. I like that. The color tank is the same size, but partitioned into three compartments for the different colors, making each one about 6-8 mls for each of the the cyan, magenta and yellow.

Plus, I do this on the table with lots of room to work, nothing close enough to spill and LOTS of handy paper towels. Fortunately, the ink is waterbased and if I get a mess, I can clean it up if I'm quick.

Further complicating the issue is that the printer keeps track of the cartridges and the ink levels. So I keep a rotating stock of three of each black and color tanks. It "remembers" the last two tanks it's seen and will treat it as though it's empty. But by the time I put the third one in, it thinks it's a new tank--full. I can also override the "fuel gauge" functionality, but I am reluctant to do that since running them dry is a bad idea. Better I should know they're low and refill than just run them into the ground. I risk damaging the print head and that's a lot more money. Not helpful in my quest for frugality.

Plus when I refill them, I work in a cleared area, newspaper down, nothing close enough to spill, and plenty of paper towels around. Fortunately, the ink is water based so it's possible to clean it up if I work fast. But not on cloth. Only on hard surfaces.
xoxoxoBruce • Oct 20, 2006 11:52 pm
I have cut the cartridges and found the batting inside was still 85% lily white.
I'm thinking earlier attempts, that were maybe 50% successful, were plagued by my attempt to overfill. :smack:
BigV • Oct 24, 2006 2:11 pm
For HP cartridges, the capacity is listed on the packaging. That should be an absolute maximum refill amount, assuming you bled it d-r-y. I reckon the capacity for a given cartridge is listed on the website as well.
busterb • Oct 31, 2006 6:48 pm
Well the HP Scanjet 4370 goes back tomorrow. I've installed 4 times. When you open the what ever they call it center and click scan a photo or doc, it opens up something else and tells me it needs files from CD rom. Boy a call to support is such fun. A message told me that due to my computer config. it only installed the express version of the image zone program???