Christianity vs. Islam - Page 6

Flint · 08-09-2007, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rexmons

...
Also, it seems like America, being a more relaxed and idle country has a much larger homosexual population than say China.

There will be fewer openly homosexual individuals in a repressive society. That doesn't mean there are fewer actual homosexuals.

Rexmons · 08-09-2007, 12:50 PM

you would think homosexualism would be promoted by the government in an over-populated country which puts restrictions on family size. does anyone have a "Homosexual Demographic World Map"? lol

Flint · 08-09-2007, 12:55 PM

You'll never get accurate numbers on something that people could get their ass kicked, or worse, for admitting to.

DanaC · 08-09-2007, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Also, it seems like America, being a more relaxed and idle country has a much larger homosexual population than say China.

Nope. They're just more accepted and therefore not having to hide it.

Happy Monkey · 08-09-2007, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rexmons

Take into consideration all the bisexuals who can easily choose either sex.

And when you fall in love with someone, someone else could tell you that you could easily choose someone else.

But maybe you couldn't.

Clodfobble · 08-09-2007, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rexmons

Also, it seems like America, being a more relaxed and idle country has a much larger homosexual population than say China.

Not according to the US Embassy.

08-09-2007, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rexmons

maybe i was being a little vague, I believe homosexuality exists, however i personally do not agree with it. Kind of like someone saying "I don't believe in hitting my children". Does that kind of make sense?

What is wrong with it? Specifically.

piercehawkeye45 · 08-09-2007, 04:37 PM

You can not assume all homosexuality is a choice because a few people have chosen to be homosexuals. If only one person is genetically homosexual you have to assume everyone is until you find out otherwise.

Rexmons · 08-10-2007, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkzenrage

What is wrong with it? Specifically.

Personally I believe it's both unnatural and unholy.

xoxoxoBruce · 08-10-2007, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45

You can not assume all homosexuality is a choice because a few people have chosen to be homosexuals. If only one person is genetically homosexual you have to assume everyone is until you find out otherwise.

But, the $64 question is, what difference does it make in a free country?

piercehawkeye45 · 08-10-2007, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rexmons

Personally I believe it's both unnatural and unholy.

Unholy I won't go into but unnatural?

Over 500 species have been found to perform some sort of homosexual behavior, many of them being apes.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15750604/

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

But, the $64 question is, what difference does it make in a free country?

It doesn't until we get into laws. A law has to assume that it is genetic because we are in a republic but individual people can think what they want.

freshnesschronic · 08-10-2007, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45

Unholy I won't go into but unnatural?

Over 500 species have been found to perform some sort of homosexual behavior, many of them being apes.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15750604/

True, but aren't mutations flaws in the DNA? And they are abundant in life and species. In fact they are important to evolution. So couldn't being homosexual be a genetic flaw? Not saying it's wrong, just speculating. I kinda agree with unnatural-it doesn't help reproduction, one of the controversial meanings of life.

Happy Monkey · 08-10-2007, 05:41 PM

Mutations are natural.
Homosexuality may or may not be a mutation. It could also be reaction to hormone levels in utero, or any number of other causes. It could be a collection of recessive genes working together.
It could help reproduction. Not for the person, but for their close genetic relatives.
- The same gene(s) that cause homosexuality could help reproduction when expressed differently for heterosexuals.
- In pre-history, gay members may have provided assistance to their family clans that helped propagate the family DNA.

xoxoxoBruce · 08-10-2007, 07:35 PM

DNA? Mutations?

bluecuracao · 08-12-2007, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freshnesschronic

I kinda agree with unnatural-it doesn't help reproduction, one of the controversial meanings of life.

I think homosexuality is natural for that very reason. If every human being engaged in relationships for the purpose of reproduction, we'd all have been dining on Soylent Green for quite some time now.

08-09-2007, 12:50 PM	#77
Rexmons - Kavkaz United - Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 613	you would think homosexualism would be promoted by the government in an over-populated country which puts restrictions on family size. does anyone have a "Homosexual Demographic World Map"? lol __________________ "Life's a bitch but God forbid the bitch divorce me..."

08-09-2007, 12:55 PM	#78
Flint Snowflake Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Dystopia Posts: 13,136	You'll never get accurate numbers on something that people could get their ass kicked, or worse, for admitting to. __________________ **************** There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio**

08-10-2007, 05:41 PM	#88
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	Mutations are natural. Homosexuality may or may not be a mutation. It could also be reaction to hormone levels in utero, or any number of other causes. It could be a collection of recessive genes working together. It could help reproduction. Not for the person, but for their close genetic relatives. The same gene(s) that cause homosexuality could help reproduction when expressed differently for heterosexuals. In pre-history, gay members may have provided assistance to their family clans that helped propagate the family DNA. __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

08-10-2007, 07:35 PM	#89
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	DNA? Mutations? Attached Images __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

08-09-2007, 04:37 PM	#83
piercehawkeye45 Franklin Pierce Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Minnesota Posts: 3,695	You can not assume all homosexuality is a choice because a few people have chosen to be homosexuals. If only one person is genetically homosexual you have to assume everyone is until you find out otherwise.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)