The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Home Base
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-01-2007, 03:43 PM   #61
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluecuracao View Post
So what if he is? It's worth discussion.

Indigenous people have migrated back and forth for millennia, long before and even while Europeans and their descendents came in and started establishing and moving around the borders. That's kind of what's still happening with the migrant workers; but because of the restrictions put in place in the 90s, it became too difficult to go back and forth. So now a lot of them stay, and have become part of the undocumented immigrant population in the U.S.



That's the low end of the estimate; other estimates put the population at more than 100 million, pre-Columbian and pre-disease epidemics.
Immigration is a legal issue, nothing more.
I am all for legal immigration, good for them, I'm happy they are here.
I don't care where someone is from, there is only one human race regardless how much melanin they may, or may not, have... as long as they do not break the law.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 04:54 PM   #62
bluecuracao
in a mood, not cupcake
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Yes it does.

But the fact remains, all those groups came from somewhere else, over thousands of years.
It is not a fact that all Native American groups came from somewhere else--only a theory. So far, DNA and language roots of some groups can be traced to other origins, but not all.
bluecuracao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 04:59 PM   #63
bluecuracao
in a mood, not cupcake
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkzenrage View Post
as long as they do not break the law.
rk, you said you broke the law when you jaywalked...I don't care where you're from, either, but what should we do with you?
bluecuracao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 05:04 PM   #64
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluecuracao View Post
It is not a fact that all Native American groups came from somewhere else--only a theory. So far, DNA and language roots of some groups can be traced to other origins, but not all.
It is a fact. There are theories on what paths they took, but they did come from somewhere else.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 05:13 PM   #65
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluecuracao View Post
rk, you said you broke the law when you jaywalked...I don't care where you're from, either, but what should we do with you?
I paid the fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 05:52 PM   #66
bluecuracao
in a mood, not cupcake
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey View Post
It is a fact. There are theories on what paths they took, but they did come from somewhere else.
Yes, there are theories based on very good evidence that some, even many, groups came from somewhere else, particularly Asia. But all the evidence found so far doesn't support as fact that all groups came from somewhere else.
bluecuracao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 06:03 PM   #67
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Whoa Nellie. I've always been told that mankind started in Africa. Everyone on Earth is descended from that spot. Are you saying there was more than one beginning????
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 06:07 PM   #68
bluecuracao
in a mood, not cupcake
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
Yeah, and mankind starting in Africa is a theory. A widely-accepted theory, but a theory nonetheless.
bluecuracao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 06:30 PM   #69
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
So is gravity.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 06:37 PM   #70
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
That DNA project, National Geographic is doing, is looking for people that didn't decend from Africa as one of their goals. I'm under the impression that all the Indians they tested are tied to Asia. Maybe the Asians started here. Interesting.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 08:02 PM   #71
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluecuracao View Post
But all the evidence found so far doesn't support as fact that all groups came from somewhere else.
Yes it does.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 08:05 PM   #72
jinx
Come on, cat.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
Flint, I gotta say, I'm pretty disappointed with your point. I thought you were really gonna go somewhere, show us some new stuff, or something... Your facts are exactly what I was taught in school.

And further;

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flint
I didn't invent the term Native American. It has a universally accepted meaning.
No it doesn't.

Quote:
In April 2005, United States Senator John McCain introduced an amendment to NAGPRA which, in section 108, would change the definition of "Native American" from being that which "is indigenous to the United States" to "is or was indigenous to the United States."[4] By that definition, Kennewick Man would be Native American, whether or not any link to a contemporary tribe could be found. Proponents of this argue that is in accord with current scientific understanding, which is that it is not in all cases possible for prehistoric remains to be traced to current tribal entities, not least because of the social upheaval, forced resettlement and extinction of entire ethnicities caused by disease and warfare in the wake of European colonization. Doing so, however, would still not remove the controversy surrounding Kennewick Man as then it would have to be decided which Native American group should take possession of the remains if he could not be definitively linked with a current group. To be of practical use in a historical and prehistorical context, some argue further that the term "Native American" should be applied so that it spans the entire range from the Clovis culture (which cannot be positively assigned to any contemporary tribal group) to the Métis, who only came into being as a consequence of European contact, yet constitute a distinct cultural entity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue
Yeah, and mankind starting in Africa is a theory. A widely-accepted theory, but a theory nonetheless.
Widely accepted because there is no evidence of it starting anywhere else. Sort of like the clovis first theory being based on a lack of evidence of anyone coming before, until recently. Its amazing, but for almost a century no one bother to dig past the clovis layer because they assumed there would be nothing there. Crazy.

One theory of pre-clovis people suggests that the first americans were austrailians.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.
jinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 08:07 PM   #73
bluecuracao
in a mood, not cupcake
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
OK HM, I look forward to reading your fact-proving dissertation.
bluecuracao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 08:11 PM   #74
lumberjim
I can hear my ears
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 25,571
Quote:
The shape of the skulls changes between 9,000 and 7,000 years ago from being exclusively negroid to exclusively mongoloid. Combined with rock art evidence of increasing violence at this time, it appears that the mongoloid people from the north invaded and wiped out the original Americans.
Quote:
The identity of the first Americans is an emotive and controversial question. But the evidence from Brazil, and a handful of people who still live at the very tip of South America, suggests that the Americas have been home to a greater diversity of humans than previously thought - and for much longer.
lumberjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 08:21 PM   #75
bluecuracao
in a mood, not cupcake
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
Wow, I hadn't seen the Australian origins thing before--how interesting.
bluecuracao is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.