Prince Harry in Iraq - Page 2

TheMercenary · 05-03-2007, 03:09 PM

It would go a long way if he were to go and fight like his loyal future subjects.

BigV · 05-04-2007, 12:55 PM

mercy: What would the compliment to that be? That is, what do you think the consequences would/should/could be were he to choose not to serve/fight?

Aliantha · 05-04-2007, 07:00 PM

It's fairly unlikely he'll ever be on the throne. Both his father and brother would have to die for that to happen.

bbro · 05-16-2007, 11:48 AM

He's not going and apparently very disappointed.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe...rry/index.html

glatt · 05-16-2007, 12:18 PM

Good. He shouldn't go. As mentioned above, he would be a liability.

Rexmons · 05-16-2007, 12:29 PM

it's not fair to the soldiers in his unit, he is increasing the risk to their lives as well as his own.

King · 05-16-2007, 01:19 PM

It's far too dangerous for both him and his men for him to go. He would be targeted. If the insurgents got hold of him it would be an absolute disaster. It's been mentioned that other Royal Family members have served in combat before, such as Prince Andrew in the Falklands, but the difference is that the Argentinians were unlikely to have beheaded him on video if he had been captured. It's been reported today that he won't go, and then later that he will go, so who knows?

bbro · 05-16-2007, 02:00 PM

If I remember the article correctly, those are all some of the reasons they are not sending him

King · 05-16-2007, 02:03 PM

Hmm, it seems the story I read about him going has since been removed, and all that is there says he isn't going, so I guess right now he isn't. That's good.

monster · 05-16-2007, 07:41 PM

Perhaps it's all part of the disinformation campaign?

Happy Monkey · 05-16-2007, 07:44 PM

He's gonna "Prince and the Pauper" his way into the war!

DucksNuts · 05-16-2007, 09:10 PM

He's not going and I agree with the decision.

I can understand his disappointment, but dems de breaks

05-03-2007, 03:09 PM	#16
TheMercenary “Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo” Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Savannah, Georgia Posts: 21,393	It would go a long way if he were to go and fight like his loyal future subjects. __________________ Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!

05-04-2007, 12:55 PM	#17
BigV Goon Squad Leader Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Seattle Posts: 27,063	mercy: What would the compliment to that be? That is, what do you think the consequences would/should/could be were he to choose not to serve/fight? __________________ Be Just and Fear Not.

05-04-2007, 07:00 PM	#18
Aliantha trying hard to be a better person Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 16,493	It's fairly unlikely he'll ever be on the throne. Both his father and brother would have to die for that to happen. __________________ Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber

05-16-2007, 12:29 PM	#21
Rexmons - Kavkaz United - Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 613	it's not fair to the soldiers in his unit, he is increasing the risk to their lives as well as his own. __________________ "Life's a bitch but God forbid the bitch divorce me..."

05-16-2007, 01:19 PM	#22
King Conquistador Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Everywhere Posts: 259	It's far too dangerous for both him and his men for him to go. He would be targeted. If the insurgents got hold of him it would be an absolute disaster. It's been mentioned that other Royal Family members have served in combat before, such as Prince Andrew in the Falklands, but the difference is that the Argentinians were unlikely to have beheaded him on video if he had been captured. It's been reported today that he won't go, and then later that he will go, so who knows? __________________ "I've shot you, Jeff. With a bullet made of Scottish finance regulations."

05-16-2007, 11:48 AM	#19
bbro Insert witty comment here Join Date: May 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC Posts: 2,182	He's not going and apparently very disappointed. http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe...rry/index.html

05-16-2007, 12:18 PM	#20
glatt ™ Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Arlington, VA Posts: 27,717	Good. He shouldn't go. As mentioned above, he would be a liability.

05-16-2007, 02:00 PM	#23
bbro Insert witty comment here Join Date: May 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC Posts: 2,182	If I remember the article correctly, those are all some of the reasons they are not sending him

05-16-2007, 02:03 PM	#24
King Conquistador Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Everywhere Posts: 259	Hmm, it seems the story I read about him going has since been removed, and all that is there says he isn't going, so I guess right now he isn't. That's good. __________________ "I've shot you, Jeff. With a bullet made of Scottish finance regulations."

05-16-2007, 07:41 PM	#25
monster I hear them call the tide Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Perpetual Chaos Posts: 30,852	Perhaps it's all part of the disinformation campaign? __________________ The most difficult thing is the decision to act, the rest is merely tenacity Amelia Earhart

05-16-2007, 07:44 PM	#26
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	He's gonna "Prince and the Pauper" his way into the war! __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

05-16-2007, 09:10 PM	#27
DucksNuts Bitchy Little Brat Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Queensland, Australia Posts: 5,067	He's not going and I agree with the decision. I can understand his disappointment, but dems de breaks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)