"Yum" or "ahh"? ,your choice

[jaguar]

You just made me spit a mouthful of coffee all over my laptop, thankyou.

[Catwoman]

Anytime

[lumberjim]

Originally posted by Radar
Well Dana, you wouldn't be the first or the last. I know what I'm talking about because I wasted years trying to be a "nice guy". I made every mistake in the book. Women say they want a nice guy, but while they're young and wild and horny, they don't want a nice guy. They want a one night stand with the drummer of a rock band. They want to be bent over, slapped on the ass, and driven home by a bad-ass with a bad attitude. It's only after they've been hurt by one of these guys, or they get old enough that they are tired of the wild sex and want to trade it in for stability that they go for nice guys.

There was a study released last week confirming this. It said that women would rather marry nice guys but find really good looking and muscular men to be intimidating, and far more sexy.

Nice guys only get the women after they've been used, and abused, and worn out. It's like riding a 15 year old Mercedes. Once it was a great ride, but everyone else already had a ride. Now that it's old and tired, and its days of riding fast and furious are over, the nice guy gets it.

boy, that's completely backwards.

women like nice romantic sex when they're young. IMO,It's not until they've had more experience that they start to enjoy a little more aggressive sex.

You really should cop to the satire here now radar. people might think you're serious. I mean, c'mon. who's gonna take advice about sex from a constitutional scholar?

I'm about as manly as any of you guys in here, and if my friend's wife gave us all hummers while the cowboys beat the eagles, I would "like" his wife more.....I might even visit that friend more often, but respect her more? no. I'm not so superficial as to say that I'd lose all respect for her, but you have to wonder about someone's motives if they do that. I'd actually lose respect for my friend.


btw, this is a great analogy. Nothing like using real world examples to illustrate your point, radar. I know that these round robin blow jobs happen all the time. Now if I can just figure out where........

Radar, Skunks is giving you a face-saving out. Of course you were just joking. Even I, a newbie, have noticed how your posts sparkle with a dry, ironic wit.

And, LJ, your Jinx is a lucky gal. You have shown more understanding of the feminine psyche than any other man so far in this discussion. You are exactly right. At 18 most women still dream of a Prince Charming to sweep them off their feet. As we become more experienced and self confident, we become more interested in those "walks on the wild side." Also, a woman's sexual drive peaks much later than a guy's. A woman's sex drive is higher in her 30's than it was in her teens.

[Catwoman]

But back to the food vs sex thing. Is it possible to be a supper whore? If you eat, say, three meals a day does this render you debauched and does this vary for men and women? Is a man who consumes two burgers at the same time looked upon with more respect than a woman who does the same? This is the real philosophical question. Is it the action (eating, sex) that is judged or the person performing it?

[wolf]

Originally posted by jaguar
Keep in mind some of this guy's other brilliant suggestions include disbanding the Federal Reserve, the FCC and the FDA.

That's where the man is right, and thus the struggle in dealing with some of the odder beliefs (like Radar's Guide to Chicks) that he puts forth. He's right on the Federal Reserve (which is not a federal agency and has no reserves) and the FCC anyway ... I'm all for revamping the FDA's drug approval process, but that one I think we need.

[wolf]

Originally posted by OnyxCougar


... but if I was stuck on a desert island and I had to choose between radar and bruce, Radar would die from lack of sex.

No question. Bruce and I would be having a wonderful time, carving dodads, among other activities. Radar would be bait.

Originally posted by wolf


No question. Bruce and I would be having a wonderful time, carving dodads, among other activities. Radar would be bait.

Now its my turn to spew coffee all over my lap top! Thank you, Wolf, for starting my day out with a good laugh! Bruce should be flattered by this harem he's aquiring among the female side of the cellurites!

[jaguar]

Reserve is more complex but the FCC? Imagine a world with no emissions control! Sure they're a bunch of asses and it needs revaming bigtime (and surgical seperation from big business) but their core purpose I see as utterly essential in the age of WiFi, cellphones and computers.

[Tomas Rueda]

I'm sorry to interrupt but, what does the FCC have to do with sex or food? and what does FCC stand for?

[lumberjim]

THE FOOD AND COOTCHY COMMISION

[jaguar]

Old argument with Radar a long time ago in which he stated he wanted to abolish the FCC. The FCC is the Federal Communications Commission. Their job (among other things) is to make sure that devices to not put out 'dirty' EM interference that screwed up other devices near it and assign/licence radio frequencies. These days it's a massive entity with it's fingers is pretty much everything form of media and communication.

[Tomas Rueda]

Their job (among other things) is to make sure that devices to not put out 'dirty' EM interference that screwed up other devices near it and assign/licence radio frequencies.

J

Are you saying that Radar is 'dirty'?

[jaguar]

I would not classify radar as a device.

[Tomas Rueda]

So how would you classify him?