![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Quote:
so everyone can read the original writings and decide for themselves. V, you could have just expressed your feelings in your first posting. Instead, you played it out, asking for "plainer, blunter, more precise and direct language", not for language that is "unemotional, balanced, and suitable" for an non-political news article. What I responded was not (necessarily) the way I would write such a news article. But part of the reason I have been following the situation in Japan is a frustration within myself about the future of energy production For me, it is not un-emotional; instead it is a serious question with an emotional component, as from the following... If I assume, and I do, that "global warming" is real and caused primarily by increased C02, which at this time is caused/aggravated by the activities large, industrial nations, then where are all the future energy needs going to come from ? Half of the energy in the US is from coal... that's not a sustainable solution. Natural gas may be cleaner, but it still yields CO2 ... likewise not a solution Solar/wind may be feasible but do not seem to me to be efficient enough to meet world needs. So... right now I tend to agree that nuclear reactors may well become the most likely path followed. But having lived through 3-Mile Island and Chernobyl in a career of public health, I believe the general public has been and is being soft-soaped about the state of the art and the current safety of reactors. We are seeing this acting out in Fukushima... technically, politically, and financially. The U.S. and other world authorities are openly expressing doubt about the competence of Tepco. Yet, of all countries we might expect to do a really great job of engineering for efficiency and safety, and from the only people who have actually suffered, not one but two, nuclear explosions on their land, we still see that bad things do happen... really bad things. Eventually, I'm confident we will learn of men who died working to remedy this disaster. So when it comes down to it on nuclear power, emotion cannot be left out just for the sake of being "fair and balanced" I feel people need the words to enable them to visualize the problems. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|