![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Lecturer
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 796
|
And Lamplighter, do you ACTUALLY believe that most employers will be continuing to pay into a medical insurance plan, that isn't required, for their employees?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Quote:
Employers with an annual employee levels of less than 30 FTE (full time equivalents) remain exempt from Obamacare, and larger businesses (50 FTE) are required to provide health insurance. Even if some employers change their benefits, it will be a relatively small part of the economy, and will eventually sort itself out over the years. But to your point... The economics of employee benefits does not change just because of Obamacare. Employers can spend $ on wages or on employee benefits, such as health care... their choice. But tax benefits to the employer of the costs of health insurance are 35% So, employers can balance spending 100% more in a salary raise, against only 65% more in an increase in benefits to the employee... their choice. That is not even considering the more "emotional" side of maintaining employer/employee relationships, including such impacts on the business as employee turn-over, employee illness/absense, positive employee motivations towards the business, etc. Last edited by Lamplighter; 09-30-2013 at 09:58 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Lecturer
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 796
|
Quote:
And the Union officials met with Obama just recently. Oh, they're not saying what deal was reached - but they got one, probably won't kick in until 2015 though, and all the fuss dies down. I don't know what to say, except that businesses (unlike our stupid fed gov't), will NOT continue to support "Cadillac" health care plans, for the vast majority of their work force. A few VIP's, sure. The rest - no. Oh, Apple might, because they're VERY flush with $$$ right now. The vast majority will not, however. Quote:
I disagree. "Grandma" disagrees, as well. When said we should "just send her home with a pain pill", (instead of giving her a treatment), I believe every word of it. They have it in Great Britain, also. You get old, and now you don't qualify for this or that treatment, any more. Here's your pain pill. That will work wonders to cure your cancer. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
"Continuing" answers your question. It wasn't required before the ACA, and they did it.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|