The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-21-2013, 05:44 PM   #13
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Is there ever a time when a transvaginal ultrasound is truly necessary over a regular on-the-belly one? Back when I was a fertility patient I thought I'd received about every invasive procedure you could imagine, yet I'd never even heard of a transvaginal ultrasound until the last year or two, in conjunction with this new nonsense requiring women to get one before an abortion. I suppose logically you could guess that it produces better images, but really, when you consider the anatomy, there seems to be more tissue between the vagina and the baby--like the whole cervix on the bottom, and intestines towards the back--compared to the relatively thin outer abdominal wall. Development of the fetus doesn't seem like it should matter either: they can see a little fertilized egg with a regular ultrasound at even 6 weeks.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.