Obama vs Romney Debate

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by Flint

By contrast, I think Romney had the problem that I often run into as an IT guy: facts are boring. Sound, traditional ideas aren't sexy. Listening to an executive-level businessman speak about the broad view of matters, wherein large chunks of ideas are zipped in small keyword packages, for brevity's sake, tends to, when not examined thoroughly, appear to contain deceptively less information than if fully expounded. I got it, I understood what he was saying, but as a technical person who deals with logic all day long, I tend to latch on to concepts like: the guy who is telling me that he knows how to do something can demonstrate that he has previously been successful at doing this thing. That counts more than rhetoric, to me. That counts more than the other guy having great zingers. To me.

That's what Obama did in the first debate and got creamed. He learned.

[DanaC]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

That's what Obama did in the first debate and got creamed. He learned.

Excellent point.