Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC
You can't just say it's a fact because you borrowed some phrasing from scientific papers and expect people to just take your word for its veracity.
|
I will not spend a half day researching what was published so many times so long ago. I summarized the studies I learned from. Cited enough details from those studies that you can go find them, if you must.
But the point reamins. I learned this stuff before posting. Big_V clearly has zero research. He only has his feelings. He only posts denials - not even one fact. Repeated denials when he clearly never learned this stuff is only a cheapshot. Politicians called it swiftboating.
Should I also cite the paper that proves a Higgs Bosum exists? Or will you take my word for it without quoting phrases used by those researchers.
The point is obvious. Big_V has conclusions accented by only by insults and denials. Without knowledge of even one study. If he had learned this stuff, then expressions such as "forced extramarital liaisons" and "copulatory ambushes" would not inspire displeasure. Why that emotion? Because Big_V is posting denials without learning any of this. He never read any of those phrases. In the tradition of UG and Akins.
Now, if you have a problem with these summarized studies, then quote a contrarian study. Don't deny because you don't like the conclusion. These things were written even at a layman level.