Work help

[Pico and ME]

Glasses were a nightmare for me in the last decade. I always used our insurance which was Davis Vision and my glasses never ever came out right the first time. I had pretty high astigmatism and nearsightedness while also needing help for reading. So the last time, I decided to spend the money (which ended up being nearly $600), AND STILL HAD THE SAME PROBLEM. That's when I decided to get the eye surgery.

Now I have the same problem but without glasses. WTH anyway.

[Spexxvet]

Originally Posted by monster

Would the customer's decision always be based on cost? All of these trichotomies seem to reflect cost -maybe you can find one that reflects need.....? Shift the focus, so to speak. Most people will get the implied cost/luxury differences....

That's what I'm trying for. Cheap/affordable/expensive doesn't address the reasons for the cost difference.

I guess for AR I could go

clear/clear and less scratchable/ clear, less scratchable and easier to clean

That's what I want to convey, but it's a bit wordy.

Originally Posted by Pico and ME

Davis Vision

They are teh suxors X infinity. They portray that they provide a free pair of glasses, but the pairs that are free are worthless - crappy looking, poor quality, and poor vision. They are made by a Davis lab - the optician who takes your order has absolutely no control over quality. And, to be honest, I've heard stories where the optician doesn't care about the patient's problems because (s)he is making diddly on the transaction (I've also heard a Walmart Optical employee say "what do you expect, you bought glasses at Walmart for $39"). We do not participate with Davis for those reasons. BTW, I think that if you choose other than Davis product, you'll pay about average retail for the galsses - you don't get any savings, really.

[Lamplighter]

clear / durable / smudge resistant

[glatt]

I'd avoid clear, because it implies the others are cloudy.