![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
AT&T pioneered the transistor, Telstar, laser, Unix OS, advanced programming languages, telecommunications, cell phones, submarine optical communication, digital switching, and even what is now a standard option for all homes - telephone, internet, and broadcasting all on one cable. The so called "Triple Play". Instead, AT&T management either stifled the innovation, refused to upgrade, or simply sold off a crown jewel so that a money losing operation could claim a few more years of profit. Even the Bell Labs are owned by people more innovative - the French. Eventually all that was left was their wireless business. To avert bankruptcy, AT&T sold itself to Southwest Bell. Purchased mostly for its name.
General Motors played the same game for over 30 years. Selling or mortgaging everything to claim profits that really did not exist. Then blamed the government, economy, unions, Japanese, taxes, and anything else they could rather than admit business school graduates design bad cars. The Volt and Camaro being latest examples. As paper becomes less desirable and popular (in books, newspapers, Postal service, business records, financial transactions, currency, etc), some companies would rather reinvent the paper printing industry. Why are so many once American institutions simply mortgaging themselves over the past 20 and 35 years rather than innovate? Major changes in how American business works and the resulting diminished productivity take that long to finally appear on spread sheets. A company that invented the digital camera - and could not bother to profit from it - now only has patents left. Meanwhile, it stupidly thinks it will become profitable by making paper printers. Nobody is offering to buy their only remaining assets - patents. From the Washington Post of 4 Jan 2012: Quote:
Kodak was kept alive by a Wall Street that will lend to buggy whip industries rather than to innovative ones. It is good for Kodak to sell its last remaining asset so that Kodak can claim a few more years of profits? Another money game so popular since 1980. A patriotic Wall Street would have demanded that Kodak get into some innovative business. Even digital cameras (first developed and then all but abandoned by Kodak) are no longer a growth industry. Quote:
Of course, someone might fire their president. It took Obama to fire GM's only problem. But Wall Street, that could, will only enrich themselves at the expense of workers and the nation. Money can be made by prolonging existing decay. It is how Wall Street now works. Massive profits at the expense of workers and all other Americans. Kodak's only future is in a business that has now started a slow decline. Is no longer a growth industry. What was clearly a growth industry 30 years ago is now following telegraphs, tape recorders, and vacuum tubes. Last edited by tw; 01-05-2012 at 02:50 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|