Transparency - Not!

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced

I agree. Facts are facts and you chose them selectively.

The fact is that it was the Bush AG who charged the city of Dayton with employment discrimination and it was a federal court that imposed the settlement lowering the testing standards. I still dont understand how that makes Holder, the current AG, a racist. In fact, if he didnt enforce the cout order, that would be acting outside the law.

And in the Philly voter intimidation case, you misrepresented the facts. There was not one voter who filed a complaint of intimidation, with the sole testimony coming from a Republican video person on site and a Republican attorney who was not on site. Yet you claim that the DoJ had a strong case that voters were intimidated. Which is not true and why the Bush DoJ ultimately chose not to seek a criminal charge and chose to pursue a civil suit instead. Holder also sought a civil injuntion against the one person carrying the club and dropped the charge against the one who was legally present as a poll watcher certified by the city. In fact, there is nothing outside the law about Holder's action.

Facts are facts but you cant simply ignore the facts you dont like.

IMO, you ignored what I think objective oberservers would consider highly relevant and pertinant facts.

I choose to believe those on the inside who experienced the actions at the DOJ, you choose to ignore them as not relevant. What else is new. It is your job to defend this Administration. Their word trumps your opinion.