The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2011, 03:53 PM   #1
lookout123
changed his status to single
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
Again, that's a good reply to a statement I didn't make. Please point to the part where I said cutting costs was the solution? Cutting costs would be a welcome and needed byproduct of cutting out the fraud, waste, and abuse in the R&D process. You're so quick to regurgitate your factoids that you don't even stop to contemplate whether you do in fact disagree with a post.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin
lookout123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2011, 04:06 PM   #2
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookout123 View Post
Cutting costs would be a welcome and needed byproduct of cutting out the fraud, waste, and abuse in the R&D process.
On that we agree. But anything you might say is not the point. I deal with the realities. The topic is waste and excessive spending. No problem. I gave two simple examples of why even what you have posted cannot happen.

If we cannot even eliminate $1 billion per year wasted on paper dollar bills, then we have too many extremists in Congress. And too few people to address the real problems.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2011, 04:26 PM   #3
Pete Zicato
Turns out my CRS is a symptom of TMB.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
But anything you might say is not the point.
So.... You discount prima facie anything lookout might ever say? You might want to clarify your meaning.

Also you seem to have changed your argument. Earlier it seemed that you were arguing against R&D cuts. Now you seem to be saying that such cuts would not be possible. Are you changing course, or is that a pile-on?
__________________


Talk nerdy to me.
Pete Zicato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2011, 04:40 PM   #4
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Zicato View Post
So.... You discount prima facie anything lookout might ever say? You might want to clarify your meaning.
I am trying to identify the real problem. What DanaC only calls a tangent. To step back and see why these details are not solvable, often ignored, and lost in the bickering.

We have a $trillion problem. Our Congress goes to war over a misguided, insignificant, and trivial $38 billion. And cannot even discuss eliminating the paper dollar bill. That (and not those details) are the bigger problem. And that includes a military that is twice the size of what it should be due to hype and fear.

I had a feeling that sentence would not be understood.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.