No House resolution honoring SEAL's bin Laden mission

[monster]

Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced

Wow.

Ten minutes to say "thanks guys" for the historical record is just too much.

Well you posted as I was posting and I did note that I knew nothing about it....

really? only 10 minutes?

[Fair&Balanced]

Originally Posted by monster

Well you posted as I was posting and I did note that I knew nothing about it....

really? only 10 minutes?

Its written in advanced, agreed upon in advance, read on the floor, no debate, then voted on.

[monster]

Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced

Its written in advanced, agreed upon in advance, read on the floor, no debate, then voted on.

So the people writing it in advance etc... what would they be doing otherwise, and how long does all the agreement process take?

[Fair&Balanced]

Originally Posted by monster

So the people writing it in advance etc... what would they be doing otherwise, and how long does all the agreement process take?

I would guess a staff person wrote it. One party leader's staff calls the other party's staff person, they both agree on it and take it to their party caucus lunch . Someone reads it while they eat their Navy Bean Soup so every member can hear it and its a done deal and in the Congressional Record.

[monster]

Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced

I would guess a staff person wrote it. One party leader's staff calls the other party's staff person, they both agree on it and take it to their party caucus lunch. Someone reads it while they eat their Navy Bean Soup and its a done deal and in the Congressional Record.

yah, waste of time. Guess it's the foreigner in me.

[Fair&Balanced]

Originally Posted by monster

yah, waste of time. Guess it's the foreigner in me.

I'll leave that to historians of the future who rely on resolutions printed in the Congressional Record to get a sense of what happened in the past.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced

I'll leave that to historians of the future who rely on resolutions printed in the Congressional Record to get a sense of what happened in the past.

Oh yea, they will get a LOT out of those details now won't they! Not. It is so frigging vague it is laughable. A feel good resolution to make them look like they are doing something important.

[monster]

Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced

I'll leave that to historians of the future who rely on resolutions printed in the Congressional Record to get a sense of what happened in the past.

But that is not the only way history is written (thank FSM)

[DanaC]

Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced

I'll leave that to historians of the future who rely on resolutions printed in the Congressional Record to get a sense of what happened in the past.

Speaking as a historian, I'd really like to applaud this sentiment.

Much of what we know of past governments comes from that kind of document, and debates in the House.

I don't see how it is a waste of time. It would take very little time to actually draw up. The only thing that would make it a waste of time wuold be to unnecessarily treat as a matter of controversy and waste a bunch of time discussing it and overanalysing it.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced

I would guess a staff person wrote it.

Speaks to most of the BS that comes out of that dysfunctional group of whores.