![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Quote:
Your cutsie bumper sticker, is just a less than clever statement of your opinion, and has no bearing on the realities or consequences of any actions taken but the coalition in Afghanistan.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
All other relevant parties are also making decisions based upon what occurred in 2003. For example, why would Pakistan want to be helpful? Pakistan is vying for control after America leaves. Pakistan is at war with India over who will be their ally in Afghanistan. From Pakistan's viewpoint - and especially because Afghanistan is so much like the South Vietnamese government (corrupt) - Pakistan only cares about winning the hearts and minds of the victor. Doing so to defeat India. How do we get Pakistan to conduct war against the Taliban? The Karzai government must be replaced by a government that does not promote overt corruption. But that is not going to happen. Just one of so many reasons why we have been defeated so many years ago. And we still do not yet know it. How do great nations fold? They end up trying to get into wars everywhere. The two longest (hot) wars in America's history - Mission Accomplished and Afghanistan. And we are paying for them at Halliburton prices using Chinese money. Even if we win militarily, how serious is this defacto defeat? And bin Laden still runs free thanks to George Jr's surrender in 2003. Never forget the disaster preached by George Jr when he said, "America does not do nation building." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Quote:
I'm not sure, how many countries from the original "coalition of the willing" are still in"? People don't usually leave the winning team As in the last years of the the Viet Nam war (for those of us old enough to remember ![]() the situation seems very similar... militarily and politically. Presidents have a very hard time getting past the "not on my watch" attitude. So we hear more and more often from leaders that, - even tho our troops have done everything we asked of them, the war can not be won militarily, only politically and so it's now up to [insert current favorite - Vietnamization / Afghanstanmization / Pakistanimization]. So rather than wait for a another political turning-point, like the Tet Offensive, where we won the battle but lost the war it's reasonable to support our troops by bringing them home. Yes, it is just my opinion. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
The sentiment, In my opinion, is an option which should be seriously placed in consideration, and not trivialized as a bumper sticker slogan.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|