TSA authorities can fine you $10,000 for leaving the airport - Page 9

xoxoxoBruce · 11-30-2010, 10:44 AM

No, because if it's the pilot you can't stop him from crashing anyway, even with an unlocked door. You might be able to keep him from hitting a particular building, but I doubt he'd announce it beforehand.

Undertoad · 12-07-2010, 10:37 AM

This guy has an artificial hip, so he sets off the metal detector every single time he flies... and so he gets the pat-down every single time he flies... which is quite often. So here he strips down to a speedo when going through the metal detector, so he can show once and for all what's going on.

They refuse to let him board, and make him go through security again with his pants on, so they can pat him down.

It's just the utter insanity that gets me on this one. It's come to this: there is a complete lack of logic or common sense involved here. That tells us that the system is ineffective by design. The lowest level employee is not empowered to make the simplest of decisions. As a result, enormous time is wasted on things that are obviously not security threats.

TSA workers are often compared to McDonalds workers. That's unfair. I've worked at McDonalds. Ordinary employees are allowed to make common sense decisions. A simple decision like Hey, cleaning fluid got on the burgers, so we have to throw the burgers out, is made by McDonald's employees all the time. A TSA employee would not be allowed to make that call. So it leads to this.

footfootfoot · 12-07-2010, 01:02 PM

More correctly, TSA employees should be compared to people who could not get hired as McDonald's employees.

There is a use for people who are incapable of thinking for themselves:
Suicide missions and cannon fodder.

Spexxvet · 12-07-2010, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by footfootfoot

More correctly, TSA employees should be compared to people who could not get hired as McDonald's employees.

There is a use for people who are incapable of thinking for themselves:
Suicide missions and cannon fodder.

It could be that they are told not to think for themselves, and do what they're told.

Can you imagine how a TSA employee would be cricified if (s)he let someone through, and that someone blew up a plane?

Bullitt · 12-07-2010, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet

It could be that they are told not to think for themselves, and do what they're told.

Can you imagine how a TSA employee would be cricified if (s)he let someone through, and that someone blew up a plane?

So I'm supposed to feel sorry for them? Fuck that.

Spexxvet · 12-07-2010, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullitt

So I'm supposed to feel sorry for them? Fuck that.

Can you accept that there could possibly be an alternate explanation?

Bullitt · 12-07-2010, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet

Can you accept that there could possibly be an alternate explanation?

An alternate explanation for what? Listen, I'm a firefighter and as much as it sucks I've failed to save a life before. It was over a year ago and I still think about it and can see the woman's face very vividly. Bad shit happens to good people, you do your job as best you can within your limits and hope for the best. If it turns out bad, tough luck deal with it and anyone who blames you for something bad happening when you've followed all the procedures, well they can go to hell.

Shawnee123 · 12-07-2010, 03:11 PM

All the TSA people will quit their jobs then everyone will bitch that they don't want to work and want handouts.

Seriously, it's not the employees' fault. I bet they lose their job if they stray even slightly from the protocol. It seems rather harsh to judge the people who are just doing what they're told to do, saying they must be more stupid than fast food employees.

*knocks on people's heads* I'm not saying it's not a stupid stupid stupid policy, but the employees have no say in the matter, I'm sure.

"You do your job as best you can within your limits." What limits do you suppose the TSA puts on its employees? Do you think they would love to use common sense?

Bullitt · 12-07-2010, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123

"You do your job as best you can within your limits." What limits do you suppose the TSA puts on its employees? Do you think they would love to use common sense?

I was speaking of limits in general. They only way TSA can be 100% effective in stopping threats is to not let anyone in. That isn't an option, so being an employee there you have to realize and accept that the measures will not stop everything. And when the day comes that someone does get through and the shit hits the fan, know that blame cannot be placed on you for following procedures. I'm sure many would love to use common sense, just as many also love power-tripping in their position. It is a mixed bag, they aren't all helpless pawns just doing their jobs, and they aren't all egotistical megalomaniacs.

footfootfoot · 12-07-2010, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123

It seems rather harsh to judge the people who are just doing what they're told to do, saying they must be more stupid than fast food employees.

"I was only following orders" isn't that the Nuremburg defense?
Maybe not more stupid, maybe more stupid. I was talking about the ability to think for yourself and within that concept is encompassed "despite what your superiors may have told you."

And I stand by my original assertion, we need people like that, people who follow orders without question. "Run into that cave and flush out the enemy? Fuck you, sarge." <---not that kind of attitude.

Spexxvet · 12-08-2010, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullitt

So I'm supposed to feel sorry for them? Fuck that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullitt

I have a degree of sympathy for them

Ok, I'm confused.

Quote:

Originally Posted by footfootfoot

There is a use for people who are incapable of thinking for themselves:
Suicide missions and cannon fodder.

Quote:

Originally Posted by footfootfoot

"I was only following orders" isn't that the Nuremburg defense?
Maybe not more stupid, maybe more stupid. I was talking about the ability to think for yourself and within that concept is encompassed "despite what your superiors may have told you."

And I stand by my original assertion, we need people like that, people who follow orders without question. "Run into that cave and flush out the enemy? Fuck you, sarge." <---not that kind of attitude.

I doubt that these people are "incapable of thinking for themselves". I'll bet that they want to keep their jobs, and keep flying safe. If they were to quit in righteous indignity, there'd be ten applicants for every abandoned position.

Bullitt · 12-08-2010, 11:07 AM

Those were two different issues. I don't feel sorry for them if something happens after they follow all their protocol. And neither should they. I do feel sorry for their economic position of just needing a job in this economy, and many probably don't like the new rules and procedures any more than the average passenger.

glatt · 12-15-2010, 03:31 PM

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

Shawnee123 · 12-07-2010, 03:27 PM

Quote:

That isn't an option, so being an employee there you have to realize and accept that the measures will not stop everything. And when the day comes that someone does get through and the shit hits the fan, know that blame cannot be placed on you for following procedures

And that's just what I'm saying. Those people probably were following procedures, and thinking "awwww fuck this sucks but I need this job." They're probably REALLY tired of the shit they get all day long, but they need the job. So they follow the stupid procedures that don't make sense even to them.

Otherwise, their ass in on the line. They don't get to pick and choose. It is, I'm sure, a very set protocol. I bet their procedures dont' allow for individual expression. I think this is where people are getting way off track.

In other words, everyone is raping the messenger. The messenger just doesn't want to be unemployed in this economy.

*shrug*

Bullitt · 12-07-2010, 03:39 PM

I'm sure their protocol is extremely rigid, just as it is here in the EMS world. Public safety has gotten that way over the years in all forms fire, EMS, police, TSA, etc. Deviate and you're screwed because that protocol is your Bible and you better have it memorized word for word. I get tired of seeing people in pain and family members suffering all the time, but it's my job that I chose and I wouldn't be here if I wasn't willing to deal with it.

I have a degree of sympathy for them in regards to just needing the job in this economy. They're in a sucky situation, I'm sure many of them were employed long before the enhanced pat downs and scanners were implemented. What should they do, quit over moral issues? Not in this economy.

11-30-2010, 10:44 AM	#1
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	No, because if it's the pilot you can't stop him from crashing anyway, even with an unlocked door. You might be able to keep him from hitting a particular building, but I doubt he'd announce it beforehand. __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

12-07-2010, 01:02 PM	#3
footfootfoot To shreds, you say? Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet! Posts: 18,449	More correctly, TSA employees should be compared to people who could not get hired as McDonald's employees. There is a use for people who are incapable of thinking for themselves: Suicide missions and cannon fodder. __________________ The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs

12-07-2010, 03:11 PM	#8
Shawnee123 Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya? Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 21,206	All the TSA people will quit their jobs then everyone will bitch that they don't want to work and want handouts. Seriously, it's not the employees' fault. I bet they lose their job if they stray even slightly from the protocol. It seems rather harsh to judge the people who are just doing what they're told to do, saying they must be more stupid than fast food employees. knocks on people's heads I'm not saying it's not a stupid stupid stupid policy, but the employees have no say in the matter, I'm sure. "You do your job as best you can within your limits." What limits do you suppose the TSA puts on its employees? Do you think they would love to use common sense? __________________ A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice. --Bill Cosby

12-08-2010, 11:07 AM	#12
Bullitt This is a fully functional babe lair Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Akron, OH Posts: 2,324	Those were two different issues. I don't feel sorry for them if something happens after they follow all their protocol. And neither should they. I do feel sorry for their economic position of just needing a job in this economy, and many probably don't like the new rules and procedures any more than the average passenger. __________________ Kiss my white Irish ass.

12-15-2010, 03:31 PM	#13
glatt ™ Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Arlington, VA Posts: 27,717	"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..." Attached Images

12-07-2010, 10:37 AM	#2
Undertoad Radical Centrist Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Cottage of Prussia Posts: 31,423	This guy has an artificial hip, so he sets off the metal detector every single time he flies... and so he gets the pat-down every single time he flies... which is quite often. So here he strips down to a speedo when going through the metal detector, so he can show once and for all what's going on. They refuse to let him board, and make him go through security again with his pants on, so they can pat him down. It's just the utter insanity that gets me on this one. It's come to this: there is a complete lack of logic or common sense involved here. That tells us that the system is ineffective by design. The lowest level employee is not empowered to make the simplest of decisions. As a result, enormous time is wasted on things that are obviously not security threats. TSA workers are often compared to McDonalds workers. That's unfair. I've worked at McDonalds. Ordinary employees are allowed to make common sense decisions. A simple decision like Hey, cleaning fluid got on the burgers, so we have to throw the burgers out, is made by McDonald's employees all the time. A TSA employee would not be allowed to make that call. So it leads to this.

12-07-2010, 03:39 PM	#15
Bullitt This is a fully functional babe lair Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Akron, OH Posts: 2,324	I'm sure their protocol is extremely rigid, just as it is here in the EMS world. Public safety has gotten that way over the years in all forms fire, EMS, police, TSA, etc. Deviate and you're screwed because that protocol is your Bible and you better have it memorized word for word. I get tired of seeing people in pain and family members suffering all the time, but it's my job that I chose and I wouldn't be here if I wasn't willing to deal with it. I have a degree of sympathy for them in regards to just needing the job in this economy. They're in a sucky situation, I'm sure many of them were employed long before the enhanced pat downs and scanners were implemented. What should they do, quit over moral issues? Not in this economy. __________________ Kiss my white Irish ass.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)