The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2010, 06:22 PM   #1
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Polls fail on many levels. You know that as well as I do.

The most important thing for me is to get TEXAS and NM on board with the policy and lawful laws that AZ has inacted. Let Calif deal with the hoards by their inactions. I am cool with that.
The first step should be for the federal judiciary to determine if the AZ law, is in fact, lawful....or should we just assume it is because it is popular and the governor says it is lawful.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 06:28 PM   #2
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
The first step should be for the federal judiciary to determine if the AZ law, is in fact, lawful....or should we just assume it is because it is popular and the governor says it is lawful.
To late. The Feds had their chance. That chance has come and gone for many years.... many years and many Administrations. Time for the States to take over. None of the laws inacted in AZ violate current Federal Law. The Feds should have no say from this point forward. Each state has the right to deal with it as they see fit within the constraints of current law that has not been enforced by the Feds.
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 06:31 PM   #3
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
To late. The Feds had their chance. That chance has come and gone for many years.... many years and many Administrations. Time for the States to take over. None of the laws inacted in AZ violate current Federal Law. The Feds should have no say from this point forward. Each state has the right to deal with it as they see fit within the constraints of current law that has not been enforced by the Feds.
But werent you the one who pointed out that Constitution gives the power "to establish a uniform rule of naturalization" to the federal government (Congress)? The "supremacy clause" may be at issue as well.

In fact, we dont know if the new law violates federal law (on one or more points of law). We have lots of opinions on both sides. And that is why we have a federal judiciary and it has yet to rule.

Last edited by Redux; 06-26-2010 at 06:43 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.