Beef. . . Its What's For Dinner!

Undertoad · 06-05-2010, 07:11 PM

Yes, my mistake; I had interpreted

"Oral antibiotics, especially those that act on Gram positive organisms, became widely used at sub-therapeutic levels for their consistent ability to improve the growth of livestock (Crawford, 1983; Droumev, 1983)."

...as meaning that Oral antibiotics became widely used at sub-therapeutic levels (1983)

but I think I interpreted that incorrectly and the (1983) studies mention their consistent ability to improve the growth of livestock.

Carry on. And sorry LJ.

06-05-2010, 07:11 PM	#11
Undertoad Radical Centrist Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Cottage of Prussia Posts: 31,423	Yes, my mistake; I had interpreted "Oral antibiotics, especially those that act on Gram positive organisms, became widely used at sub-therapeutic levels for their consistent ability to improve the growth of livestock (Crawford, 1983; Droumev, 1983)." ...as meaning that Oral antibiotics became widely used at sub-therapeutic levels (1983) but I think I interpreted that incorrectly and the (1983) studies mention their consistent ability to improve the growth of livestock. Carry on. And sorry LJ.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)