Obama administration authorizes killing US citizen

[classicman]

What if "he" just continually threatens or writes blogs about how to do it? Does that change the dynamic MTP?

[morethanpretty]

Originally Posted by classicman

What if "he" just continually threatens or writes blogs about how to do it? Does that change the dynamic MTP?

Counts as emotional harm, she has a right to separate herself from him as soon as possible. There is no "just threatens or writes blogs" though, most likely it is going to escalate to real violence. I never told spud she has the right to outright kill him just because she scared. She can have him arrested if he has really done her harm, get a court order against him, move, ect.
Like I've said, this is not the same issue as abortion. Having a child has consequences physically and emotionally no matter what, every time. The soonest way for a woman to separate herself from an unwanted pregnancy is abortion.
Its the woman's choice to make individually because every case is going to be different with different outcomes for both the fetus and mother. I cannot judge how one woman's pregnancy is going to affect her, either negatively or positively. I cannot force my ideals on her knowing how emotionally and physically traumatic a pregnancy (wanted or unwanted) can be. The unborn fetus is not traumatized if it is aborted, it was not conscience of having life. The mother is the one who is fully aware through the process and can be severely traumatized depending on the circumstances of the pregnancy.

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by morethanpretty

Having a child has consequences physically and emotionally no matter what, every time. The soonest way for a woman to separate herself from an unwanted pregnancy is abortion.

And that too has consequences, including upon the father. I know.

It's not a lightly-done thing.