The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2010, 05:11 PM   #1
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
So now a libertarian magazine is not partisan because it says its non-partisan?

What facts? I see partisan opinions that you support. So whats new.

Please point out any facts in those opinion pieces that you can document from a verifiable source.

Or just get over it....the law is now the law of the land.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 05:36 PM   #2
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
So now a libertarian magazine is not partisan because it says its non-partisan?
No. It is not partisan because it supports neither the Demoncrats or the Republickins. That would be like saying the Green Party is partisan.

Quote:
What facts? I see partisan opinions that you support. So whats new.
Dispute them.

Quote:
Or just get over it....the law is now the law of the land.
Yea, see you in Nov. The "law of the land" will bankrupt us. Reid is screwed in the next election and hopefully that bitch Pelosi will get some too.
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 05:46 PM   #3
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post

Dispute them.
I will ask again.

What facts?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 05:59 PM   #4
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
I will ask again.

What facts?
Dispute the points in the article. Pretty much everything I have been talking about for the last year is now coming to the top of the discussions.

So you have no way to support the assessments of the experts on the issue and the potential fallout of the bills passage. Bottom line, this bill is not going to do what they say it will and it will cost us a hell of a lot more than the fantasy reports of the OMB.

Here is a great report about those lobbyists who feed on the whores of Congress.

{warning, from that partisan site NPR}

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=125170643
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 06:05 PM   #5
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Dispute the points in the article. Pretty much everything I have been talking about for the last year is now coming to the top of the discussions....
The points in the article are not facts, they are undocumented opinions and I disagree with them..and you. Doesnt make either one of us right...only time will tell.

I do agree that the CBO budget estimate of deficit reductions are optimistic...but nearly half of the cost is offset with hard money....$150 billion in cuts in overpayments to MA providers and a 0.9% increase in medicare payroll tax for top wage earners (over $200K) for another $250 bill.

The significant investment in medical/health care technology (in both the stimulus bill and the health reform bill) will save $$$ billions over time...just difficult to determine with certainty exactly how much.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.