![]() |
|
|||||||
| Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Quote:
Meanwhile, the secret talks at the White House continue. Even though I have posted a video of 8 time the President stood before the American public and stated categorically that the discussion would be open and transparent. There is a good like for you Redux, and your president gave it to you... Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
![]() Can you say hypocrite? Double standard? You're still not fooling anyone. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
[quote=Redux;626522]
Quote:
But as I said, the voters are going to let you know in a few short months.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I can only speak for myself.... and you are always good for a laugh (like your recent partisan pictiorial meltdown) with your double standards and blatant hypocrisy. And certainly never to be taken seriously.. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Quote:
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
In the meantime, I'll just keep watching you trip over your own posts. Most recently: On one hand, you claim the Exchanges are a fantasy and on the other hand, you insist they are a pay-off to the insurance industry…..despite the fact that the industry has spent $20 million in the last few months on media campaigns opposing the bills. Sure, they get access to potentially 30+ million new customers, but they don’t like the trade-offs which is why they are spending to oppose the bill: losing their anti-trust exemption, limits on premium in order to participate in the Exchanges and similar restrictions on increases in employer-based plans, ending exclusions for pre-existing conditions and dropping persons with coverage on a whim when faced with a new expensive condition/treatment, new limits on patient out-of-pocket expenses so no one will go bankrupt as a result of an illness, ending rate discrimination against women Then you post a column from a Democratic Senator from 4 months ago and claim he agreed that the Exchanges would not work, when in fact, he was complaining at the time that the early draft of the committee bill did not include Exchanges anywhere near those in the final bill. From there, you post a CBO letter on one small component of the bill related to one level of coverage to be offered in the Exchange and claim that updated it the overall CBO earlier findings on costs and saving and invalidated them. Followed by the typical twists and dodges with each contradiction or misrepresentation. As I said, always good for a laugh.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
You think they'll lose seats? I was just trying to read up on the latest regarding this. There seem to be a lot more R's retiring/leaving than D's.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests) | |
|
|