The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2009, 11:04 PM   #1
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Now my brother, who is 54, reasonably healthy, and single, has decided to drop his health insurance which costs him close to $500 a month. He figures it's cheaper to pay the federal and state(MA) penalties, then buy insurance (pre-existing conditions allowed) if something serious develops.

Is there a flaw to this reasoning?
The flaw is that if you have an unanticipated catastrophic event l(like a car accident that leaves you in coma or with serious internal injuries or a massive coronary while having dinner one night or just out for a walk....not something serious developing over time in which you can scam the system and get coverage for a pre-existing condition), you face a huge bill or bankruptcy.

Sure, the odds are in your favor that it wont happen. I guess one has to decide if its worth the risk to yourself and your family.

If I were a young person, I might consider it more seriously than at the age of 54.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 10:02 AM   #2
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
If I were a young person, I might consider it more seriously than at the age of 54.
You're an old fart aren't ya? lol


TRUST ME PEOPLE - Coming from personal experience, you do not want to go without insurance. A bad driver in another car... a fall down the stairs, there are a million things that can happen.

I'll give you a little taste of what the stakes are -
3 weeks in a trauma ward = about $1,000,000.
4 months in rehab center = $660,000 (bed fee) +++ meds, supplies...
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 10:43 AM   #3
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
When I started working, we used to laugh at the $1,000,000 family limit on out health insurance policies. Christ, who could ever use that up?

Now they've doubled it and I still know 4 people who maxed out.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 11:18 AM   #4
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
A close friend fainted while in line at the grocery store. She landed on her jaw and broke it into five pieces. She spent a week in the hospital and was able to go home on Christmas Eve with her jaw wired shut and pins holding it together.

She was just standing there in line. No previous medical conditions.

Fortunately, she has medical insurance to pay the tens of thousands of dollars of hospital and plastic surgery bills. Unfortunately, she doesn't have dental, and she is eventually going to need bridge work to replace some of the teeth she lost.

Having no insurance is a gamble.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 12:27 PM   #5
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
The flaw is that if you have an unanticipated catastrophic event l(like a car accident that leaves you in coma or with serious internal injuries or a massive coronary while having dinner one night or just out for a walk....not something serious developing over time in which you can scam the system and get coverage for a pre-existing condition), you face a huge bill or bankruptcy.

Sure, the odds are in your favor that it wont happen. I guess one has to decide if its worth the risk to yourself and your family.

If I were a young person, I might consider it more seriously than at the age of 54.
Under the new plan if you have no insurance you just have to pay the penalty and then buy insurance to cover you. Since you are so sick you will not be able to work and have no income so you can just get the government to pay it. People with absolutely no money get that kind of care all the time.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 12:35 PM   #6
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Under the new plan if you have no insurance you just have to pay the penalty and then buy insurance to cover you. Since you are so sick you will not be able to work and have no income so you can just get the government to pay it. People with absolutely no money get that kind of care all the time.
If you have no insurance and have a heart attack, accident, sports injury....it might result in being out of work for a short period of time, but you still are accountable for the bill.

Under the new plan, these are not pre-existing conditions and you cannot suddenly decide you want insurance retroactively for such an event.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 12:47 PM   #7
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
Under the new plan, these are not pre-existing conditions and you cannot suddenly decide you want insurance retroactively for such an event.
Really? It says that in the new bill? Got a link to that?
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 12:52 PM   #8
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Really? It says that in the new bill? Got a link to that?
Damn, Merc.

The bill covers treatment moving forward for pre-existing conditions....not to recover retroactive expenses.

Search the bill yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 01:01 PM   #9
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
Damn, Merc.

The bill covers treatment moving forward for pre-existing conditions....not to recover retroactive expenses.

Search the bill yourself.
Well once the bill is passed, in whatever form it will be it allows for no clause for a pre-existing condition. So if I have a heart attack, and a week later get health insurance, they have to cover my heart conditon. Maybe not the inital bill, because I would be responsible for that first week, but since I have no income they would just have to write off the costs. But after that I should be good to go. Pay the fine, since I don't have health insurance, buy insurance, don't have enough to pay for it because I don't have a job, get the government to pay for it. Good to go!
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 01:06 PM   #10
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Well once the bill is passed, in whatever form it will be it allows for no clause for a pre-existing condition. So if I have a heart attack, and a week later get health insurance, they have to cover my heart conditon. Maybe not the inital bill, because I would be responsible for that first week, but since I have no income they would just have to write off the costs. But after that I should be good to go. Pay the fine, since I don't have health insurance, buy insurance, don't have enough to pay for it because I don't have a job, get the government to pay for it. Good to go!
And if you have a job or investment income or any wealth and chose to not have health insurance and suffer an accident or injury or require immediate major surgery for a heart attack, as Bruce's brother would potentially face, you are financial responsible for those medical costs....it could be only a $couple hundred for broken bone or $tens of thousands for major surgery.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 01:08 PM   #11
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
You're making a lot of assumptions.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.