![]() |
|
|||||||
| Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
So what? We know there are disagreements between the House and Senate and changes will need to be made that wont please either side 100 percent. That is how the process works. It is called compromise and consensus building. ...but of course, you guys will nitpick the differences and blow them out of proportion or suggest it has never happened before. And in the end, they will agree that it would be a huge mistake to throw out a good bill in pursuit of the perfect bill. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
IMO, which I am fully entitled to have whether you like it or not, as it currently stands we as a nation are going to be saddled with an ineffective bill that doesn't truly address the cost or "reform" of our nations heath care issues. What we are doing is insuring 30 million more people (good thing) without knowing exactly how we are going to logistically provide care for them.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
BTW, one reason for the delay for the Insurance Exchange for those 30 million more people (in addition to writing the regs) is to build greater capacity and efficiencies. IMO...it is not a "blll just for the sake of a bill". I have said repeatedly that it is far from perfect, but what you guys wont acknowledge is that it provides real reform for the first time ever that will touch most Americans in a positive way. And yet, those opposed still have never offered a better alternative. Last edited by Redux; 12-27-2009 at 03:41 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|