The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-22-2009, 08:30 AM   #12
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
They were both issues considered by the committees dealing with the issue of participation, as problematic. Without the late sittings, it is now actually possible, most of the time, for an MP to travel back to their constituency the same night, after the voting is over. It didn't used to be practical. It basically opens up more possibilities in terms of commuting. Also, less necessary to have a London home so close by, can now have something a train journey away (trains wouldn't be running after voting finished; therefore many MPs slept in their office on late sitting nights.).

The difference between having a second home and having access to public owned properties, is that if they were set aside properties for Mps there wuold need to be a range of different kinds, or it wouldn't be possible for MPs to work from London and have their family (children) living with them there and enrolled in London schools. This is something quite a few of the women MPs in particular have opted to do. They then travel back and do constituency work at the weekend and during summer hols.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.