The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2009, 11:26 AM   #1
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
I dont understand the issue here.

Yes, this supplemental to the 09 budget is not in the budget that was adopted last year. 09 was Bush's last budget and did not include war funding (none of his budgets ever included war funding) and Bush's last supplemental (non-budget request) was only through May.
You are very good at avoidance Redux.
This administration made an issue of the war funding not being in the previous administrations budgets.
This administration also made a big issue of their transparency... Also this administration said that the war funding would be in the budgets from now on. ok, fine. Nothing new there.

Now just weeks after passing their budget they come back for another 85,000,000,000. I'm sure no one thought of this "in their plan" just a few weeks ago, eh? Seems rather shady to me. No one thought to slip this in so it would get counted under Bushs budget - nahhhh. That's Chicago style.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TGRR View Post
Also, why the hell would a senator vote for anything, if he isn't told why he's being asked to vote for it? Any senator that would vote for something without knowing the facts should be run out of congress. Secrecy be damned.
Yet the opposite is true. Too many sheep following the wonderful rhetoric.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 11:30 AM   #2
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
You are very good at avoidance Redux.
This administration made an issue of the war funding not being in the previous administrations budgets.
This administration also made a big issue of their transparency... Also this administration said that the war funding would be in the budgets from now on. ok, fine. Nothing new there.

Now just weeks after passing their budget they come back for another 85,000,000,000. I'm sure no one thought of this "in their plan" just a few weeks ago, eh? Seems rather shady to me. No one thought to slip this in so it would get counted under Bushs budget - nahhhh. That's Chicago style.
I dont think you get it.

Iraq/Afghanistan funding runs out this month because it was not included in Bush's FY 09 budget or his last supplemental budget request.

What option is there other than a new supplemental appropriation for funds through the rest of this fiscal year (through Sept 30)?

Its not like it could have been included in the FY 2010 budget proposal released several weeks ago.....it doesnt work that way...different year, different budget.

And starting with the 2010 budget, war costs are included.....that is a first and that is a fact.

Quote:
Yet the opposite is true. Too many sheep following the wonderful rhetoric
Is this where I am supposed to say....baaahhhh, baaahhhhh

Last edited by Redux; 04-12-2009 at 11:38 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 12:10 PM   #3
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
Is this where I am supposed to say....baaahhhh, baaahhhhh
Nah - you been saying that for awhile. JUST KIDDING.

I understand it just fine. Still seems like SSDD or SSDA.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt

Last edited by classicman; 04-12-2009 at 12:26 PM.
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 12:05 PM   #4
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
Now just weeks after passing their budget
for next year
Quote:
they come back for another 85,000,000,000.
for this year.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 12:10 PM   #5
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey View Post
for next year

for this year.
There ya go!

Filtering my political babble into simple monkey talk that even a classic human should be able to understand!
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.