![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Quote:
Maple is nice, cherry is too, but expensive. I'm partial to walnut, but it's a taste thing and has similar open pores. Oak is good too, but you might want to consider filling the pores before finishing it. There are several ways to do this. You can use a filler like this. Or start off with a thick layer of shellac, or just build up multiple layers of varnish or poly, sanding between each application. I tend to think of historical Shaker furniture as being made of maple, but I'm not sure if that's actually true. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
dar512 is now Pete Zicato
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago suburb
Posts: 4,968
|
Quote:
But you're correct in either situation. Choice of wood is a matter of taste.
__________________
"Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain." -- Friedrich Schiller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Quote:
That would be like painting curly maple white, spackling a pressed tin ceiling, or doing a Leopard with Miss Clairol. You can do from a light (natural) finish all the way to a deep mahogany red, and it will still be oak and beautiful.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|