The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2009, 10:07 PM   #1
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Nukes take many years to get from "lets build it", to bring it on line. During the entire process the regulatory powers are constantly changing the rules. Even after the final plan has all the necessary approvals and construction begins, they keep changing the rules, in many cases requiring the contractor to rip out work completed to accommodate those changes or redesign things that hook to the changes.

This has been the rule, with no exceptions, since they've been building them.

France has been successful with nukes by standardizing one design and let them build as many as they wanted, all alike. That way you know what you're building and how much it will cost, up front.
Then maybe we should follow their example. Oh wait! We can't! We hate the French!
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 10:10 PM   #2
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
There is still the problem of nuke waste, where to store it.

Of course we couldn't put it where we did all those bomb tests, and won't be safe for a million years anyway.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 10:44 PM   #3
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
I would rather spend the money on alternative, green technologies than on nuclear power plants. It takes too long to build them, and there is a very real risk that goes along with it. Plus, it's way expensive to build them. I think developing newer, cleaner technologies will help create a LOT more jobs (even an industry boom, much like the computer boom), can be executed a LOT faster, and the risk is negligible.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 11:33 PM   #4
TGRR
Horrible Bastard
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: High Desert, Arizona
Posts: 1,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarpop View Post
I would rather spend the money on alternative, green technologies than on nuclear power plants.
Like solar? You know, where the process used to make the panels creates a shitload of horrible chemicals?
TGRR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 11:32 PM   #5
TGRR
Horrible Bastard
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: High Desert, Arizona
Posts: 1,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
There is still the problem of nuke waste, where to store it.

Of course we couldn't put it where we did all those bomb tests, and won't be safe for a million years anyway.
You mix it with sand, fuse the sand into glass, and store it in caves in the Arizona mountains.

End of fucking story.

Problem is, once they agree on a place, half of the NRC has worked itself out of a job...so they'll keep putting it in 25 year barrels and stacking them up.
TGRR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.