The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-14-2009, 09:33 AM   #1
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
You can't start a radio station in America, it is verboten. The Feds control access to the air waves. For the most part mega-corps control the content. The Air America disaster was a Democrat attempt to follow the Limbaugh prototype. They sucked and lacked Limbaugh's timing. I don't support the fairness doctrine but I also don't support the Feds protecting corporations from competitors. We need to loosen up the license distribution for low and medium power radio if we want a freer market. Radio is a closed market enforced by the Feds. The fairness doctrine is a democrat solution for a democrat problem not an attempt at free speech protection.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 09:34 AM   #2
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
You can't start a radio station in America, it is verboten. The Feds control access to the air waves. For the most part mega-corps control the content. The Air America disaster was a Democrat attempt to follow the Limbaugh prototype. They sucked and lacked Limbaugh's timing. I don't support the fairness doctrine but I also don't support the Feds protecting corporations from competitors. We need to loosen up the license distribution for low and medium power radio if we want a freer market. Radio is a closed market enforced by the Feds. The fairness doctrine is a democrat solution for a democrat problem not an attempt at free speech protection.
Great minds think alike!

Radio ownership consolidation has not provide any benefits to the public...and it is the public airwaves!
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 09:38 AM   #3
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
Great minds think alike!
Yeah. Careful though, I've been known to tear off a libertarian rant that'd make Radar look like a commie.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 10:01 AM   #4
slang
St Petersburg, Florida
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
...and it is the public airwaves!

What if the shows were not broadcast through the airwaves? Then what? Any changes to the content of the shows by the Feds?

For the last few years nearly everyone that I know that listens to Rush or Glenn or whoever on radio have used the MP3s, not the airwaves.

Most corporate buildings ( That I've worked in anyway ) tend not to be places that recieve a consistent and strong signal through the airwaves. For a short period those listeners at work would listen to the streaming show through the computer. It didn't take long for that to cease via tightening the screws on the LAN.

Downloading the MP3s is a good way at listening to the shows nowdays and I've even seen employees scoot home to download or capture the shows on file and bring it back to work to distribute.

If the Feds clamp down on the airwaves it seems possible that there is a big loophole for what the Dems hope to accomplish just by using the electronic files generated of the show.

There will surely be some type of business snag here and there to get around but those big broadcasters have been preparing for this new doctrine for some time. The re-introduction of this is not some big surprise.

I'm not convinced that there will be all that big of changes that listeners think about this.

What would be the alternate method of silencing the shows after converting to MP3 only? Who knows. The only thing for sure is that yes, this is having an impact and the gov't knows it.

How they are going to stomp it, that's the only real question.
slang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 10:11 AM   #5
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by slang View Post
What if the shows were not broadcast through the airwaves? Then what? Any changes to the content of the shows by the Feds?

For the last few years nearly everyone that I know that listens to Rush or Glenn or whoever on radio have used the MP3s, not the airwaves.

Most corporate buildings ( That I've worked in anyway ) tend not to be places that recieve a consistent and strong signal through the airwaves. For a short period those listeners at work would listen to the streaming show through the computer. It didn't take long for that to cease via tightening the screws on the LAN.

Downloading the MP3s is a good way at listening to the shows nowdays and I've even seen employees scoot home to download or capture the shows on file and bring it back to work to distribute.

If the Feds clamp down on the airwaves it seems possible that there is a big loophole for what the Dems hope to accomplish just by using the electronic files generated of the show.

There will surely be some type of business snag here and there to get around but those big broadcasters have been preparing for this new doctrine for some time. The re-introduction of this is not some big surprise.

I'm not convinced that there will be all that big of changes that listeners think about this.

What would be the alternate method of silencing the shows after converting to MP3 only? Who knows. The only thing for sure is that yes, this is having an impact and the gov't knows it.

How they are going to stomp it, that's the only real question.
The issue for me is the public airwaves...because they are public, I think they should provide a greater public benefit than has been demonstrated by ownership consolidation.

I have no interest in regulating the internet for content or site ownership.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 10:22 AM   #6
slang
St Petersburg, Florida
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
The issue for me is the public airwaves...because they are public.....I have no interest in regulating the internet for content or site ownership.
It seems quite reasonable that the only issue for you is the airwaves. There are many in the gov't that would like to see the content disappear. That's both Rs and Ds at different times.

We'll see if the content is an issue after this new doctrine passes.

My money is on...."it's the content". Especially after the lib radio falls flat again, even with the new regulations.
slang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 10:27 AM   #7
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by slang View Post
It seems quite reasonable that the only issue for you is the airwaves. There are many in the gov't that would like to see the content disappear. That's both Rs and Ds at different times.

We'll see if the content is an issue after this new doctrine passes.

My money is on...."it's the content". Especially after the lib radio falls flat again, even with the new regulations.
I dont think a new Fairness Doctrine has any chance of passage.

At best (or worst) we might see FCC regulations rolling back the number of stations that a company can own in a local market.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.