The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2009, 07:33 PM   #511
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
......George Jr...........George Jr .....George Jr .....
What about Bin Laden?
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 08:00 PM   #512
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
What about Bin Laden?
And again TheMercenary subverts the topic of a thread. It requests a wacko extremist to grasp a concept, learn reality, and ignore what Limbaugh tells him to say.

So again, TheMercenary destroys another thread.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 08:09 PM   #513
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
.....TheMercenary.....wacko extremist......Limbaugh.....TheMercenary .....
What about George Jr?
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 09:34 PM   #514
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
The article only suggests what we know - the two administrations are talking - nothing more. George Jr is telling Obama what he will do despite what Obama has been planning.
The first sentence you have correct. The second is nothing but your opinion, contrary to what the article repeated states.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
What is routinely negative is classicman who routinely attacks this poster at every opportunity; who never deals with reality that opposes his politics; who never posts supporting facts.
When was the last time? I have called you out several times recently on your "claims", but I have not "attacked" you. None of which you substantiated, by the way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
Always attack and insult others who oppose wacko extremism - classicman.
Who me? You outta look at your last dozen posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
George Jr is spending money that Obama already had plans for. Is that cooperation as classicman claims?
Cite? The article you posted infers to the contrary based upon the issue of a veto.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 09:45 PM   #515
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianna View Post
I can't believe this thread is still going.

It's OVER, folks. They bailed the bums out.
I'm afraid it's a long way from over, you'll (we'll) have to bend over awhile longer.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 09:47 PM   #516
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
... as will our children.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 11:21 AM   #517
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
When was the last time? I have called you out several times recently on your "claims", but I have not "attacked" you.
If you were something above a turd, you doubts would include from you supporting facts for you doubt. You don't like it?

Cite.

After all, I am calling you out for personal attack and underhanded mockery. An honest classicman would include reasons for doubts with 'cite'. But classicman routinely has opinions based only in passive aggressive attacks. Cite, classicman, means you first put up something you rare provide - facts.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 11:47 AM   #518
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
you doubts would include from you supporting facts for you doubt
No, I don't need to post facts to question unsubstantiated claims. If you back up your claims with citations/sources, only then do I have to produce substantiated facts to disprove your claims. If you repeatedly post opinion as fact, and personally attack anyone questioning your statements, your credibility goes through the floor.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 12:16 PM   #519
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
...yup below the basemen...er cellar.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 12:30 PM   #520
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
No, I don't need to post facts to question unsubstantiated claims.
Then why did you do just that?
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 12:32 PM   #521
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Cite.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 12:47 PM   #522
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Cite.
Already provided.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 12:49 PM   #523
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 02:05 PM   #524
lookout123
changed his status to single
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
tw's asshatery in this thread is so funny i had to make sure it wasn't the TW. persona just mocking him.

*note to self: if I ever find myself unable to differentiate between myself and a caricature... just stop.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin
lookout123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 07:47 PM   #525
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
From thw Washington Post of 8 Jan 2009 as posted previously in post 505
Quote:
Bush Prepares to Ask for Second Tranche of Bailout Funds
Senior Bush administration officials are preparing to ask lawmakers for the second half of the $700 billion financial rescue package despite intense opposition in Congress and then use a presidential veto if the request is voted down, sources familiar with the matter said.
Today, George Jr offered to rescind his request for the $350billion TARP money unless asked to do so by Obama. Obama today called George Jr to ask him to put forth that request. IOW George Jr had not consulted with Obama until today.

Four days later, on 12 Jan 2009 in the NY Times:
Quote:
“This morning, President-elect Obama asked President Bush to formally notify Congress, on his behalf, of his intent to exercise the authority under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act to access the last tranche of $350 billion in funding for Treasury programs addressing the financial crisis,” Dana Perino, the White House press secretary, said in a statement. “President Bush agreed to the president-elect’s request.” ..

The decision to request the money now reflects the calculation by Mr. Obama and his aides that it would be better to have both the incoming and outgoing presidents urging lawmakers to release the money, given the high level of anger and frustration on Capitol Hill over how the Bush administration has managed the bailout program.
Congress is not happy how the money was spent without corresponding concessions and without accounting for what it was used for.

Curiously, the law is written so that if Congress does not release the cash, then the president can sign a veto and get it anyway.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.