Apathetic Australians?

[tw]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

wtf?

As a supporter of George Jr and Rush Limbaugh, are you so low in class as to only post profanity? Do you have any kids under the age of 5? Just worried for the kids.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by tw

As a supporter of George Jr and Rush Limbaugh...

WTF?

[tw]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

WTF?

Amazing the class of people who find profanity amusing. Are those kids under 5 - and therefore at risk? Kids are at greater risk with lower class parents.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by tw

Amazing the class of people who find profanity amusing. Are those kids under 5 - and therefore at risk? Kids are at greater risk with lower class parents.

Do you quote Time magazine and UFO as well? WTF?

[classicman]

Originally Posted by tw

As a supporter of George Jr and Rush Limbaugh, I am so low in class as to only post profanity. Do you have any kids under the age of 5? Just worried for the kids.

Still doing the name calling thing eh? Yet when done to you, you cry foul. Interesting.

By the way what do the name calling age of children and your assumptions about Rush and GWB have to do with anything on topic here?

[tw]

Originally Posted by classicman

Still doing the name calling thing eh? Yet

You too can be low class. All one need do is post profanity and find it amusing. That's not name calling. That is simple reality. A characteristic of low class and poorly educated people who would attack the messenger rather than deal with facts.

Profanity is a strong indicator of low class people who are also easily subverted by wacko extremist ideals. No insult. Just hard reality. Posting profanity with intent only to disparage is routine from TheMercenary.

The accuracy is stunningly obvious by so manyTheMercenary replies. He apparently has trouble with his class status. A inferiority made obvious because he so routinely posts profanity. Makes me wonder if he too was a boy genius. There is a similarity in attitude. Not personal attacks. Just a logical speculation.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by tw

You too can be low class. All one need do is post profanity and find it amusing. That's not name calling. That is simple reality. A characteristic of low class and poorly educated people who would attack the messenger rather than deal with facts.

Profanity is a strong indicator of low class people who are also easily subverted by wacko extremist ideals. No insult. Just hard reality. Posting profanity with intent only to disparage is routine from TheMercenary.

The accuracy is stunningly obvious by so manyTheMercenary replies. He apparently has trouble with his class status. A inferiority made obvious because he so routinely posts profanity. Makes me wonder if he too was a boy genius. There is a similarity in attitude. Not personal attacks. Just a logical speculation.

WTF?

[classicman]

Originally Posted by tw

Amazing the class of people who find profanity amusing. Are those kids under 5 - and therefore at risk? Kids are at greater risk with lower class parents.

I find your diversionary tactics rather amusing. It's what you are good at. You completely ignored the discussion when you were challenged and decided to go on a witch hunt.
Merc may not be used to you doing this, but you've been called out numerous times with the same result. Diversions. Can you link one post where you admitted you were wrong? Just one.

If find it appalling that you hide under the guise of "I'm simply posting facts" - Bullshit.

Get back on topic.

[classicman]

Originally Posted by tw

You too can be low class. All one need do is post profanity and find it amusing. A characteristic of low class and poorly educated people who would attack the messenger rather than deal with facts.

Or one (in general) could just regurgitate a magazine (the Economist) on a daily basis and act as if one was superior to other posters. That's pretty low class too.
Whatever floats yer boat . . .

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by classicman

By the way what do the name calling age of children and your assumptions about Rush and GWB have to do with anything on topic here?

I don't think he'd know. He's not, I think, a father -- and what's the likelihood of anyone wanting his babies?