![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
NPR opposing direct democracy
Morning Edition had an lovely interview interview this morning. They had a discussion with a disgruntled lobbyist/ex-legislator who wants to get rid of the referrendum process because "special interests" are hijacking the process. He was never challenged by the interviewer. I guess democracy is great until Democrats start losing jobs. Yes, the referrendum process often has stupid irrational outcomes but I wouldn't say our normal processes are much more rational and are certainly less responsive. The defense of Davis ignores the fact that he is a much resented machine politican. My brother is a union official and a Green Party member who was essentially coerced into helping him get re-elected, I suspect he's happy to see the evil bugger get his.
*edit sloppy vB
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis Last edited by Griff; 08-18-2003 at 02:00 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
|
Easy Griff...I listened to the same interview, and I don't think he nor NPR were necessarily Democratic propagandists.
The United States is a republic, not a true democracy. If we were a true democracy, nothing would ever get done. Maybe because I'm not from California, I don't get it. But it seems like the anger towards him is a bit misdirected, i.e. they're blaming the wrong guy. And IMO, the recall process in California is too easy to get going. While I'm all for "for the people, by the people," tougher standards are needed for a recall there. Last edited by elSicomoro; 08-18-2003 at 09:25 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
sleep.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: So Cal.
Posts: 257
|
The problem with the referendum process is that the wrong kinds of things become law - because the general mass doesn't pay attention to all the details. The reason they elect politicians is so that they can do that kind of legwork.
As an example, in California, referendums pretty much banned all new taxes unless they were approved by voters, yet scores of other initiatives have passed that require that a certain percentage of the state's budget be given to a specific cause - afterschool programs, for example. It makes balancing the budget impossible - you can't really raise revenue, and there's a lot of stuff you simply can't cut. This isn't to say that the idea of giving freedom to the people is a bad thing, just that it's problematic, and should be watched closely. Read The Federalist Papers for a more nuanced approach. Remember, originally, the people didn't even elect their senators - it was the electoral college.
__________________
blippety blah bluh blah blah |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
lurkin old school
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,796
|
yeah, who wants quality anyway?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
I do but NPR always sounds like it comes from god forsaken place like.....like.....Lake Wobegon.
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Questionist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 8
|
No NPR in Prague, just the BBC
At least NPR is now mostly supporting itself having weaned itself from the government dole. Here in Europe we Anglophiles are subjected to the whims of the British Broadcasting Corporation. The BBC gets its funding from a manditory annual tax on all tv sets in Britain in the amount of $100 or so. They are so flush with money that they employ over 20,000 people. What most of these people do to earn their money is beyond me. In all fairness, the BBC does produce some good programming but at an unnecessary high cost.
![]()
__________________
Globalnomaddad |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Holy <b>smokes</b> that is a big tax.
This is a good time to start a capitalism vs socialism debate, isn't it? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Holy <b>smokes</b> that is a bigger tax.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
lurkin old school
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,796
|
You know, "holy smokes" is a great saying. much more interesting than "holy cow." But then there are all the Robin spin offs, great potential. "holy doublecross Batman." "holy watertight Batman" "holy beefsteak tomato Batman..."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Just what have you been smoking?
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Prolly falafel.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
lurkin old school
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,796
|
Holy burnt falafel Griffman!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Questionist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 8
|
$180 is probably the nearer figure. I confess that I was lazy and didn't look the exact amount up when I wrote the blurb. An astounding and I think outrageous amount, nevertheless.
__________________
Globalnomaddad |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|