The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

View Poll Results: have you changed your vote
I'm not allowed to vote 1 3.03%
i choose not to vote 0 0%
yes I have 6 18.18%
no I haven't 26 78.79%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-09-2008, 08:15 PM   #20
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juniper View Post
The trouble is, these politicians SAY this is the way things should be, then go and do the opposite. Doh.
That's because the truth is always unpalatable to some (regardless whch camp you're in) and because the soundbite media culture trims down anything any politician says into a devastating body blow to their campaign. They have to paint a picture that fits within fairly narrow confines.

Fundamental problems require fundamental solutions, big ideas. Unfortunately big ideas are about as dangerous a thing for a politician to express as one can possibly imagine. If what you have to say is logical and sensible, it matters not one jot. By the time the media have finished with the words that came out of your mouth, they've turned you into a dangerous communist, or a self-serving oligarch.

Individual people are pretty damn smart. Taken as a body, they make up the public and the public isn't smart, it's easily manipulated. It's easily manipulated, because it exists (by its nature) in the public sphere, and the public sphere is the media's demesne. The 24 hour news channel is King, in the realm where public opinion is formed. And the political world defers to it absolutely. It has to, It's not about the ideas, now. It's about navigating the path to the White house, trying to simultaneously inspire with change whilst reassuring with continuity.

This is the price of mass engagement in the public sphere. Big ideas get spun out into the media, where heavily biased news shows use them to create moral panic at the prospect of the other side's candidate winning. With each campaign team complicit in creating this destructive environment by throwing as much dirt as they can dig on the other (overtly or covertly taking said dirt to the public), they have effectively trapped themselves in very narrow pass. Too many concepts have become politically suicidal even to contemplate.

People don't want big ideas. We might think we do. We might even crave them. We want leaders who are capable of solving our most pressing national problems and leading us into stability and prosperity. The trouble is that requires big ideas. It requires political bravery. We don't like big ideas, we fight them. We don't like brave politicians, we don't elect them.

Unsurprisingly we (on both sides of the pond) have elected more and more craven and self-serving politicians and fewer and fewer brave politicians (or maybe I am being unfair) to high offices.

Last edited by DanaC; 10-09-2008 at 08:20 PM.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.